Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Mukesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL REJECTED

Holding

The Court held that bail could not be granted in view of the nature and gravity of the offences.

Summary

Mukesh Kumar was arrested in connection with an FIR alleging that he and co‑accused opened fire on the brother of an informant, causing his death. The charges include offences under Sections 147, 148, 149 and 302 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner applied for regular bail, arguing that he had been in custody since 17‑02‑2025. The Court examined the seriousness of the alleged offences, the material evidence and the gravity of the crime, and concluded that the circumstances did not warrant bail. Consequently, the bail petition was rejected, and the trial court was directed to complete the trial within one year of receiving the order.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail for offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302 IPC and Section 27 Arms Act

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • IPC 147
  • IPC 148
  • IPC 149
  • IPC 302
  • Arms Act 27
  • murder
  • rioting
  • high court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.91985 of 2025
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-930 Year-2023 Thana- BIHTA District- Patna
                 ======================================================
                 Mukesh Kumar S/O Awadhesh Kumar Singh R/O Village-Simari, P.S.-Bihta,
                 District-Patna.

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Brisketu Sharan Pandey, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Sangeeta Sharma, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   13-02-2026                          Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   learned A.P.Ps. for the State .

                                2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for

                   offence under Sections 147,, 148 , 149 and 302 of IPC and 27

                   of Arms Act.

                                3 . As per F.I.R. petitioner along with other co-

                   accused persons fired upon brother of informant, as a result of

                   which he died. Petitioner appears to be one of the assailants of

                   the deceased.

                                    4. Considering the nature of accusation, material

                   available on record, gravity of offence and other circumstances

                   of the case, the prayer of petitioner for regular bail is rejected.

                   However, since petitioner is in custody since 17.02.2025 ,

                   learned Trial Court is directed to expedite and conclude the trial
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.91985 of 2025(2) dt.13-02-2026
                                                        2/2




                      preferably within the period of one year from the date of

                      receipt/production of copy of this order.



                                            (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J)
Koushik/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.