Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Bihari RaiversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The Court granted bail to the petitioner, directing him to furnish a bail bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties.

Summary

The petitioner, Bihari Rai, sought bail in an NDNDPS case (Cr. Misc. No.9381 of 2026) where he was charged under Sections 8, 17(b) and 18(b) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act and Section 111 of the Bihar Narcotic Substances Act, 2023. The prosecution’s case was that 1.01 kg of opium was recovered from co‑accused Subodh Sah, while only a mobile phone was seized from the petitioner. The petitioner contended that he had no involvement in the drug seizure, possessed no contraband, had no prior criminal record, and had been in judicial custody since 10‑08‑2025. He also highlighted that the co‑accused had already been granted bail in a related matter. After hearing both sides, the Court found the petitioner's claim credible and deemed the evidence insufficient to deny bail. Consequently, the Court ordered his release on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties of equal amount.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner under the NDPS Act and Bihar Narcotic Substances Act given the nature of the alleged offences.
  • Whether the presence of only a mobile phone in the petitioner's possession and the bail granted to a co‑accused affect the bail decision.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • bail
  • NDPS Act
  • drug trafficking
  • criminal antecedent
  • surety
  • judicial custody

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9381 of 2026
                  Arising Out of PS. Case No.-350 Year-2025 Thana- CHIRAIYA District- East Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Bihari Rai Son of Late Sukhal Rai @ Late Sukhal Ray R/o Village -
                 Mohadipur, PS. - Chiraiya, District - East Champaran.

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Sunil Kumar No.III, Adv.
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mrs. Rina Sinha, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER
2   19-02-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with

                   N.D.P.S. G.R. Case No. 108 of 2025 arising out of Chiraiya P.S.

                   Case No. 350 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under

                   Sections 8, 17(b) and 18(b) of the N.D.P.S. Act and Section 111 of

                   the B.N.S., 2023.

                                3. The case of the prosecution in short is that altogether

                   1.01 kg of opium was recovered from the possession of one

                   Subodh Sah and from the possession of this petitioner, one mobile

                   was recovered.

                                4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner

                   has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no

                   offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also

                   submits that save and except mobile phone, nothing has been
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9381 of 2026(2) dt.19-02-2026
                                                       2/2




                     recovered from the possession of this petitioner. He also submits

                     that Subodh Sah on whose possession opium was recovered has

                     already been granted bail by the learned coordinate bench of this

                     court vide Cr. Misc. No. 7548 of 2026. He further submits that a

                     statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner

                     has no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial

                     custody since 10.08.2025.

                                  5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP

                     for the State.

                                  6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                     considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is

                     inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail.         The above named

                     petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond

                     of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the

                     like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions

                     Judge/Special Judge NDPS Act, East Champaran, Motihari in

                     connection with N.D.P.S. G.R. Case No. 108 of 2025 arising out of

                     Chiraiya P.S. Case No. 350 of 2025.



                                                    (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
Sudhanshu/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.