Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Bharat Yadav @ Bharat Kumar @ Bharat NatversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

Bail was granted to the petitioner subject to specified conditions.

Summary

Petitioner Bharat Yadav was arrested on 4 December 2025 in connection with a robbery and assault case (PS Case No. 733 of 2025) involving the alleged snatching of Rs. 48,000 and a gold chain, and assault with an iron rod causing 14 stitches to the informant. He applied for bail, claiming a clean antecedent and asserting that the FIR was fabricated and the injury was simple. The prosecution opposed bail, citing the seriousness of the offences under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 109(1), 303(2), 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the Bihar Penal Code. The Court considered the petitioner’s clean record, the nature of the injury, and the circumstances of the dispute, and decided to grant bail. Bail was ordered on a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties, subject to conditions of cooperation, appearance, non‑tampering with evidence, and verification of antecedents.

Issues considered

  • Whether bail should be granted to the petitioner despite the gravity of the offences alleged under the Bihar Penal Code.

Subjects

  • bail
  • robbery
  • assault
  • criminal procedure
  • Bihar Penal Code
  • injury
  • court conditions

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9420 of 2026
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-733 Year-2025 Thana- ARA NAWADA District- Bhojpur
                 ======================================================
                 Bharat Yadav @ Bharat Kumar @ Bharat Nat Son of Late Butan Nat R/o
                 Village - Kayam Nagar, P.S. - Koilwar, Dist. - Bhojpur.

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                          ... ... Opposite Party
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Shiv Prasad Gupta, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey, A.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   01-04-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

                               2. Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since

                   04.12.2025 in connection with Ara Nawada P.S. Case No. 733

                   of 2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2),

                   115(2), 109(1), 303(2), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of BNS.

                               3. The prosecution story, in brief, is that it is case of

                   the informant Raju Kuamr Sharma is that on 11.11.2025 at

                   about 9.00 AM in morning when informant was going towards

                   Ramna Shahid Bhawan and in the meantime petitioner Bharat

                   Bhawan and in the meantime petitioner Bharat Yadav riding on

                   Swift Desire vehicle bearing registration No. BR01JE3674

                   alongiwth four other persons and three persons riding on a

                   motorcycle started abusing the informant and snatched Rs
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9420 of 2026(3) dt.01-04-2026
                                            2/4




          48000/- cash and golden chain from his neck. It is alleged that

          petitioner Bharat Yadav assaulted repeatedly by iron rod on the

          head of the informant due to which informant got total 14

          stitches on his head Bharat Yadav and seven unknown persons

          among them two to three persons he may be identified Bharat

          Yadav is the resident of Kayamnagar his chain cost is 2,50,000

          Rs. that has been snatched by Bharat Yadav when his relative

          reached there Bharat Yadav fled away alongwith his gang and

          also threatened to kill him and his family He also operating a

          gang of snatching and said he shall not follow the law all

          persons having the pistol along with them.

                      4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

          petitioner has clean antecedent and is innocent and he has

          falsely been implicated in the present case. It is further

          submitted that the allegation as alleged in the FIR is forged and

          fabricated and the petitioner has not committed any offence as

          alleged in the FIR. Learned counsel for the petitioner further

          submits that from perusal of the FIR it appears that due to some

          petty dispute the present occurrence has taken place. It is next

          submitted that although there is specific allegation against the

          petitioner that he has assaulted the informant by means of iron

          rod and the informant has received the injury but the injury
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9420 of 2026(3) dt.01-04-2026
                                            3/4




          sustained by the informant is found to be simple in nature

          caused by hard and blunt substance. It is next submitted that

          there is no intention on the part of the petitioner to kill anyone

          and the police after investigation has submitted charge-sheet and

          petitioner is in custody since 04.12.2025.

                      5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the

          State, on the other hand, has vehemently opposed the prayer for

          bail of the petitioner.

                       6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances

          and the fact that petitioner is a person with clean and the injury

          inflicted upon the informant is simple in nature, let the

          petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail

          bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the

          like amount each to the satisfaction of District and learned Chief

          Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Ara

          Nawada P.S. Case No. 733 of 2025, subject to the following

          conditions:-

                       i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be

          properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court

          and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and

          on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient

          reason, his bail bond shall be canceled by the Court below.
           Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9420 of 2026(3) dt.01-04-2026
                                                       4/4




                                  ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the

                     witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to

                     move for cancellation of bail.

                                  iii. And further condition that the court below shall

                     verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at

                     any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his

                     criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for

                     cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the

                     acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order

                     shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of

                     verification.



                                            (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Gaurav Sinha/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.