Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Arvind Prasad @ Mahesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL GRANTED

Holding

The Court allowed the petition for anticipatory bail, subject to conditions, under Section 438(2) CrPC and Section 482(2) B.N.S.S.

Summary

The petitioners, Arvind Prasad, Lilee Prasad and Rohit Kumar, sought anticipatory bail fearing arrest in connection with Tharthari Police Station Case No. 65 of 2025, which alleged offences under Sections 191(2), 126(2), 115(2), 303(2), 109 of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The prosecution alleged that the accused assaulted a school guard, snatched his gold chain and fired weapons. The petitioners contended that they were falsely implicated due to a family altercation, that the injury to the guard was minor, no incriminating article was recovered, and that they have a clean antecedent. The State opposed the grant of anticipatory bail. The High Court, after considering the submissions, granted anticipatory bail under Section 438(2) of the CrPC and Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., subject to stringent conditions including surety, personal presence in court and verification of antecedents. The order clarified that any observations made would not affect the trial.

Issues considered

  • Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the petitioners under Section 438 of the CrPC in view of the alleged offences.
  • Whether the allegations of assault, theft and firing warrant denial of bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • Section 438 CrPC
  • Section 27 Arms Act
  • false implication
  • bail conditions
  • Criminal Procedure
  • Bihar

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9642 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-65 Year-2025 Thana- THARTHARI District- Nalanda
                 ======================================================
           1.     Arvind Prasad @ Mahesh Kumar Son of Yugeshwar Prasad R/o Village -
                  Milkipar, P.S. - Hilsa, Dist. - Nalanda.
           2.    Lilee Prasad @ Anil Prasad Son of Bikhi Prasad R/o Village - Milkipar, P.S.
                 - Hilsa, Dist. - Nalanda.
           3.    Rohit Kumar Son of Sadanand Prasad R/o Village - Agnu Bigha, P.S. - Hilsa,
                 Dist. - Nalanda.

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr.Arvind Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Ms. Pushpa Sinha, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   24-02-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

                   A.P.P. for the State.

                                2. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection

                   with Tharthari P.S. Case No. 65 of 2025 registered for the

                   offences under Sections 191(2), 126(2), 115(2), 303(2) and 109

                   of the B.N.S. and under Section 27 of the Arms Act.

                                3. As per the prosecution case, the informant has

                   alleged that he is a guard in a school and that while he had gone

                   to switch on the lights, the petitioners, along with five to six

                   unknown persons, asked his name and thereafter started

                   assaulting him with fists and even snatched away his gold chain.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9642 of 2026(3) dt.24-02-2026
                                            2/4




          It has further been alleged that the accused persons also started

          firing.

                       4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

          petitioners are falsely been implicated and in fact, the incident

          as alleged has not at all occurred. He further submits that on

          occasion of the marriage of the daughter of one Ramparit

          Prasad, who is the relative of petitioner number 1 and 2, there

          was an altercation and on account of such altercation, the

          petitioners have been falsely implicated. It has further been

          submitted that the injury was found to be simple on the right

          forearm of the informant and no incriminating article has been

          recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. It

          has lastly been submitted that the petitioners carry clean

          antecedent.

                       5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed

          the prayer for anticipatory bail.

                       6. Considering the aforesaid submission, facts and

          circumstances of the case, let the petitioners above named be

          released on anticipatory bail, in the event of arrest or surrender

          before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks

          from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/-(ten

          thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9642 of 2026(3) dt.24-02-2026
                                            3/4




          satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is

          pending/successor court in connection with Tharthari P.S. Case

          No. 65 of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down under

          Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure read with

          corresponding Section 482(2) of B.N.S.S. as well as subject to

          the following conditions:-

                          (i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be his

                          close relative.

                          (ii) The petitioners shall remain physically present

                          in Court on each date of the trial.

                          (iii) In case of absence on two consecutive dates, or

                          in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of

                          the petitioners will be liable to be cancelled by the

                          Court concerned.

                          (iv) If the petitioners are found involved in similar

                          nature of offence in future, the prosecution shall be

                          at liberty to move for cancellation of his bail bond.

                          (v) The learned Court below shall verify the

                          criminal antecedent of the petitioners and in case at

                          any stage it is found that the petitioners have

                          concealed their criminal antecedent, the court

                          below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond
               Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9642 of 2026(3) dt.24-02-2026
                                                           4/4




                                         of the petitioners. However, the acceptance of bail

                                         bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall

                                         not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of

                                         verification.

                                      7. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail is

                         allowed.

                                      8. It is made clear that the observations, if any, made

                         in this order, shall be of no bearing during the trial.



                                                  (Sourendra Pandey, J)
aditya/-

U          T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.