Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Gautam Kumar Singh @ Gautam Singh @ Gautam KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court granted regular bail to the petitioner on the condition of a bail bond and sureties.

Summary

Gautam Kumar Singh was arrested in connection with an assault case (PS Narhat Case No. 395 of 2025) where he was alleged to have struck an informant three times on the head with an iron rod, causing simple injuries to the scalp. He was charged under sections 126(2), 115(5), 351(2), 109, 303(2), 352 and 3(5) of the Bihar Penal Code and had been in judicial custody since 31‑12‑2025. The petitioner pleaded innocence and argued that the injuries were minor, seeking regular bail. The State opposed bail, highlighting the petitioner’s ten prior criminal cases. After hearing both sides, the Patna High Court considered the nature of the injuries, the length of custody, and the antecedents, and decided to grant regular bail on a bond of Rs.10,000 with two sureties.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to regular bail despite being charged with multiple serious offences and having prior criminal antecedents
  • Whether the simple nature of the injuries sustained by the informant justifies the grant of bail

Subjects

  • regular bail
  • bail bond
  • sureties
  • assault
  • injury
  • criminal antecedent
  • judicial custody
  • high court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9710 of 2026
                      Arising Out of PS. Case No.-395 Year-2025 Thana- NARHATT District- Nawada
                 ======================================================
                 Gautam Kumar Singh @ Gautam Singh @ Gautam Kumar Son of Jitendra
                 Singh @ Jitu Singh R/o Village, Post, P.S. - Narhat, District - Nawada.

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Abhay Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr. Binod Kumar, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   12-02-2026                     Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   APP for the State.

                                2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case

                   registered for the offence punishable under sections 126(2),

                   115(5), 351(2), 109, 303(2), 352 and 3(5) of BNS.

                                3. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner has

                   assaulted thrice with iron rod on the head of the informant due

                   to which he sustained injury.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. Learned

                   counsel for the petitioner has submitted that from perusal of the

                   order of the learned trial court, it transpires that the learned trial

                   court has recorded that “ it appears from perusal of the injury

                   report that the injuries although are simple in nature but were
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9710 of 2026(2) dt.12-02-2026
                                                        2/2




                      caused upon the informant’s scalp which is vital part of the

                      body.” Learned counsel has further submitted that as the injuries

                      of the informant are simple in nature, he prays for bail of the

                      petitioner. Moreover, the petitioner is languishing in judicial

                      custody since 31.12.2025.

                                   5. Learned APP appearing for the State has

                      vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail and has

                      submitted that petitioner is having criminal antecedent of ten

                      cases.

                                   6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and

                      considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is

                      inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named

                      petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with

                      Narhat P.S. Case No. 395 of 2025 on furnishing bail bond of

                      Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount

                      each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st , Nawada.



                                             (Ashok Kumar Pandey, J)
Shubham/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.