Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Mohammad Hamid HussainversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

The High Court may allow the withdrawal of a criminal miscellaneous application and dismiss it as withdrawn.

Summary

A group of petitioners filed a criminal miscellaneous application before the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar. The petitioners, through counsel Mr. Surendra Kumar Singh, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the application. The State, represented by A.P.P. Mr. Brajendra Nath Pandey, opposed the withdrawal. The Court, after hearing both sides, granted the petitioners' request and ordered that the application be dismissed as withdrawn. Consequently, the criminal miscellaneous proceedings were terminated without any substantive adjudication on the merits.

Issues considered

  • Whether the High Court may permit the withdrawal of a criminal miscellaneous application and dismiss it as withdrawn

Subjects

  • Criminal miscellaneous application
  • withdrawal of application
  • High Court procedural discretion
  • petition dismissed

Judgment

          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                  CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9742 of 2024
           Arising Out of PS. Case No.-333 Year-2023 Thana- CHAKAND District- Gaya
     ======================================================
1.    Mohammad Hamid Hussain Son of Syed Nizamuddin R O DEPTT OF
      ANATOMY GOVT TIBBI COLLEGE AND HOSPITAL KADAMKUAN P
      S KADAMKUAN PATNA 800003
2.   Mohammad Shafiur Rahman C/o Haji Mohammad Jaan R/o Maulabagh,
     Phulwari Sharif, P.s. - Phulwari Sharif, Distt. - Patna, Bihar
3.   Abdul Wahid NA C/o Federal Colony, Isopur, Phulwari, P.s. - Phulwari
     Sharif, Dist. - Patna, Bihar
4.   Kahkashan Bano W/o Anwarul Hassan R/o Durgabari, Hari Das Chaterjee
     Lane, Gaya, P.S. - Civil Line, Distt. - Gaya, Bihar
5.   Md. Ehteshamuddin S/o Md. Kamaluddin R/o Near Umar Masjid, Aliganj,
     Road no. 14, Gaya, P.S. - Town, Gaya, distt - Gaya
6.   Khawaja Salman Sharique Son of Md. Salik R/o vill - Hamjapur, P.s. -
     Amas, Dist. - Gaya, Bihar
7.   Matiur Rahman Son of Abdul Wassy R/o Chata Masjid, Bari Road, Gaya,
     P.S. - Kotwali, Distt. - Gaya
8.   Md. Shahab Alam Son of Syed Mansoor Alam R/o Mohalla - Lodhisaheed,
     Lodhi Masjid, P.s. - Sherghati, Distt. - Gaya, Bihar
9.   Abdul Fateh Farrukh Son of Mashood Manjar R/o Fakeer toli, G.B. Road,
     Chiraiyatanr, P.S. - Gaya town, Distt. - Gaya, Bihar
10. Syed Imran Ahmad Son of Md. Manjur Alam R/o Enayat Colony, Bari
    Road, P.S.- Civil Line, Distt. - Gaya
11. Hasibur Rahman Son of Shafiur Rahman R/o Abul Fazal Enclave 1, Jamia
    Nagar, Okhla, P.S. - Okhla, Distt. - South Delhi, New Delhi
12. Md. Mozaffar Alam Son of Hakim Md. Ali R/o New Karimganj, Road No.
    08, Gaya, P.S. - Civil Line, Distt. - Gaya, bihar
13. Habiba Khatoon W/o Md. Hasibur Rahman R/o Abul Fazal Enclave 1, Jamia
    Nagar, Okhla, New Friends Colony, P.S. - Okhla, Distt. - South Delhi, New
    Delhi
14. SG. Mohtashimuddin Ashrafi Son of SG. Mustafa Ashrafi R/o Asharfi
    Cottage, Samdani Gali, Panchaiti, Akhara, P.S. - Kotwali, Dist.- Gaya, Bihar

                                                                     ... ... Petitioner/s
                                          Versus
     The State of Bihar Bihar

                                            ... ... Opposite Party/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr.Surendra Kumar Singh, Adv.
     For the Opposite Party/s :      Mr.Brajendra Nath Pandey, APP
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR
            Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9742 of 2024(2) dt.10-03-2026
                                                        2/2




                                                     ORAL ORDER

2    10-03-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned

                      A.P.P. for the State.

                                   2. Learned counsel              for the petitioners seeks

                      permission to withdraw this criminal miscellaneous application.

                                   3. Permission, as sought for, is accorded.

                                   4.    Accordingly,         this        criminal   miscellaneous

                      application is dismissed as withdrawn.



                                                 (Praveen Kumar, J)

brajesh/-

U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.