Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Gopal @ Gopal GondversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
BAIL REJECTED

Holding

The court held that the petitioner’s false affidavit and prior criminal record preclude the grant of anticipatory bail.

Summary

Gopal Gond applied for anticipatory bail fearing arrest in a case (Ara Nagar PS Case No. 680 of 2025) involving alleged theft of a bag, cash and documents. The informant, a civil court employee, claimed the petitioner, while intoxicated, seized her bag containing a mobile, documents and Rs. 3,000. The petitioner argued the FIR was exaggerated after the informant obtained employment. The prosecution highlighted the petitioner’s prior criminal record in Behea PS Case No. 191 of 2024 for assault and other offences, and noted that the petitioner had submitted a false affidavit denying any antecedents. Considering the false affidavit and the seriousness of the alleged offences, the court declined to extend bail. The anticipatory bail application was therefore rejected.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to anticipatory bail in view of the alleged theft and related offences.
  • Whether the petitioner’s false affidavit and prior criminal antecedents justify denial of anticipatory bail.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • anticipatory bail
  • false affidavit
  • criminal antecedent
  • theft
  • assault
  • Bihar High Court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9866 of 2026
                     Arising Out of PS. Case No.-680 Year-2025 Thana- ARA NAGAR District- Bhojpur
                 ======================================================
                 Gopal @ Gopal Gond Son of Bipin Bihari Gond Resident of Village- Fingi
                 Tola, Bihiyan, P.S.- Bihiyan, District- Bhojpur

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                       Versus
                 The State of Bihar

                                                        ... ... Opposite Party/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Bibhakar Tiwary, Advocate
                 For the Opposite Party/s :       Mr. Md. Fahimuddin, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   23-02-2026                  Heard the parties.

                                2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in

                   connection with Ara Nagar P.S. Case No. 680 of 2025 for the

                   offence under sections 126(2), 115(2), 303(2) and 86 of the

                   B.N.S. lodged on 04.11.2025 by the informant, Gudiya Kumari.

                                3. As per the prosecution story, the informant, who is

                   serving with the Civil Court, Bhojpur at Ara, alleged that she is

                   presently working under the District Legal Services Center and

                   on 30.10.2025, as she was sitting in her office, the petitioner-

                   husband, in a drunken condition, came and took away her bag

                   containing mobile, important documents and Rs. 3,000/- cash.

                   This led to the FIR.

                                4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that after

                   she got an employment, her behavior, towards him, changed and
          Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9866 of 2026(2) dt.23-02-2026
                                                      2/2




                    exaggerated FIR is there.

                                 5. Learned counsel for the informant submits that fed

                    up with the drunken attitude of the petitioner, she already shifted

                    to her father’s home but still entering in the Civil Court campus,

                    the occurrence took place. Further, contrary to the statement

                    made in paragraph-3 that he do not have criminal antecedent, he

                    is one of the main accused in Behea P.S. Case No. 191 of 2024

                    lodged on 26.06.2024 under Sections 341, 323, 504, 307, 337

                    and 34 of the IPC and the allegation is of giving iron rod blow

                    to the informant’s husband.

                                 6. Considering the submission of the parties as also

                    the materials that are on record coupled with the fact that the

                    petitioner has made false affidavit that he do not have any

                    criminal antecedent, this Court is not inclined to extend him the

                    privilege of bail.

                                 7. The anticipatory bail application stands rejected.



                                                   (Rajiv Roy, J)
Adnan/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.