Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Gopal Yadav @ Gopal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

A revision petition may be withdrawn when the petitioner has been acquitted, rendering the petition infructuous.

Summary

The petitioner, Gopal Yadav, a child in conflict with law, filed a criminal revision petition before the Patna High Court challenging a decision of the lower court. While the case was pending, the Juvenile Justice Board acquitted him of the charges. The petitioner then moved the High Court seeking permission to withdraw the revision petition on the ground that the matter had become infructuous. The Court considered whether a revision petition could be withdrawn after an acquittal by the Juvenile Justice Board. It held that the petitioner is entitled to withdraw the petition once the substantive proceedings have concluded in his favour. Accordingly, the Court granted permission to withdraw and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal revision petition may be withdrawn after the petitioner has been acquitted by the Juvenile Justice Board

Subjects

  • withdrawal of petition
  • juvenile justice
  • acquittal
  • criminal revision
  • high court order

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                    CRIMINAL REVISION No.1141 of 2025
                         Arising Out of PS. Case No.-131 Year-2024 Thana- AGRER District- Rohtas
                  ======================================================
                  Gopal Yadav @ Gopal Kumar Son of Bindeshwari Singh Child in Conflict
                  with law), Resident of Village Nimiya P.S. Agrer District Rohtas at Sasaram
                  through his under the Guardianship of his grand father Rang Bahadur Singh,
                  Male aged about 75 years son of Late Ramadhar Singh, Resident of Village-
                  Nimiya, P.S.- Agrer, District- Rohtas.

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                  The State of Bihar

                                                            ... ... Respondent/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s    :        Mr.Raghunandan Kumar Singh, Advocate
                  For the Respondent/s    :        Mr.Umeshanand Pandit, APP
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA
                                        ORAL ORDER

3    05-01-2026                      The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks

                    permission to withdraw the present petition as the matter has

                    become infructuous after the petitioner has been acquitted by

                    the learned Juvenile Justice Board.

                                2. Permission is accorded.

                                3. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as

                    withdrawn.



                                              (Arun Kumar Jha, J)
V.K.Pandey/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.