Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

NAJNEEN FIRDOSversusMD. SALAMUDDIN

Decided
Disposal
DISMISS FOR NON-PROSECUTION

Holding

The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.

Summary

The petitioner Najneen Firdos filed a criminal revision petition against her husband Md. Salamuddin. The High Court granted the petitioner two weeks to rectify certain defects pointed out by the office. The petitioner failed to cure the defects within the stipulated period, indicating a lack of interest in prosecuting the petition. The Court therefore dismissed the petition on the ground of non‑prosecution. No substantive merits of the case were examined.

Issues considered

  • Whether the criminal revision petition should be dismissed for failure to prosecute?

Subjects

  • criminal revision
  • non‑prosecution
  • petition dismissal

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                 CRIMINAL REVISION No.1355 of 2019
                  ======================================================
                  Najneen Firdos, Wife of Md. Salamuddin, D/O - Shahzada Farooque,
                  Resident of Village - Barppm Bazar, P.O. and P.S.- Baroon, District-
                  Aurangabad (Bihar)

                                                                            ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                     Versus
                  Md. Salamuddin, Son of Late Suleman Mian, Resident of Village -
                  Jahanabad, P.O. and P.S.- Kudra, District- Kaimur (Bihar)

                                                            ... ... Respondent/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s   :      Proxy counsel.
                  For the Respondent/s   :      Mr.
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR
                                        ORAL ORDER

4    13-02-2026                   Despite two weeks’ time granted to the petitioner,

                    some defect(s), as pointed out by the office, still stand. It

                    appears that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the

                    present petition.

                                  2. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed for

                    non-prosecution.



                                                              (Jitendra Kumar, J)
S.Ali/-

U         T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.