Patna High Court

UTTAM RAIversusThe State of Bihar

Decided: 18 February 2026
Disposal: WITHDRAWN
Bench: ARUN KUMAR JHA

Holding

The Court held that it may permit the withdrawal of the revision petition and accordingly dismissed it as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioners Uttam Rai, Bikram Rai and Bajrang Rai filed a criminal revision petition before the Patna High Court challenging an earlier order. During the hearing, the petitioners' counsel sought the Court's permission to withdraw the revision petition. The Court considered whether it could allow the withdrawal of a pending revision petition. Finding no impediment, the Court granted the petitioners' request. Consequently, the revision petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

Whether the High Court may grant permission to withdraw a pending revision petition

Subjects

revision petition
withdrawal
court discretion
criminal procedure

Judgment

                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                          CRIMINAL REVISION No.364 of 2022
                           Arising Out of PS. Case No.-28 Year-2008 Thana- BHELDI District- Saran
                   ======================================================
              1.    Uttam Rai Late Hardeo Rai R/O- Vill- Jogni, Parsa, P.S.- Behldi, Dist.-
                    Saran
              2.   Bikram Rai Son Of Uttam Rai R/O- Vill- Jogni, Parsa, P.S.- Behldi, Dist.-
                   Saran
              3.   Bajrang Rai Son Of Uttam Rai R/O- Vill- Jogni, Parsa, P.S.- Behldi, Dist.-
                   Saran
                                                                           ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                  Versus
              1.   The State of Bihar
              2.    Shambhunath Singh Yadav Son Of Jeevnandan Singh R/O- Vill- Jogni,
                    Parsa, P.S.- Behldi, Dist.- Saran
                                                                   ... ... Respondent/s
                   ======================================================
                   Appearance :
                   For the Petitioner/s      :      Mr. Pratyush Pratap Singh, Advocate
                                                    Mr. Ravindra Kumar Shukla, Advocate
                   For the Respondent/s      :      Mr. Arvind Kumar Pandey (App. 84)
                   ======================================================
                   CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA
                                         ORAL ORDER

5   18-02-2026                        Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission

                     to withdraw the present revision petition.

                                      2. Permission, as prayed for, is accorded.

                                      3. Accordingly, the present revision petition stands

                     dismissed as withdrawn.



                                                               (Arun Kumar Jha, J)

Shahnawaz/-

U     T

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…