Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

SHEIKH SAFI AHMAD @ SHEKH SAFI AHEMANDversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
CONVERTED

Holding

The High Court may treat the revision petition as an appeal under Section 401(5) of the Cr.P.C. and granted permission for conversion.

Summary

The petitioner Sheikh Safi Ahmad filed a criminal revision petition challenging the dismissal of his appeal and the conviction affirmed by the Judicial Magistrate. The High Court examined whether, under Section 401(5) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, a revision petition can be treated as an appeal when an appeal is available. Citing the precedent of Rekha Devi v. State of Bihar (Criminal Revision No. 105 of 2019), the Court held that the High Court may convert a revision into an appeal if the petitioner erroneously believed no appeal lay. Accordingly, the Court granted permission to the petitioner’s counsel to convert the revision petition into a criminal appeal within a week and directed cooperation for the same. The matter is to be placed before the appropriate bench for further hearing.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal revision petition can be converted into an appeal under Section 401(5) of the Cr.P.C. when an appeal lies.
  • Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to treat a revision petition as an appeal in the interests of justice.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • Criminal Revision
  • Appeal Conversion
  • Section 401(5) CrPC
  • Procedural Law
  • High Court Jurisdiction

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                    CRIMINAL REVISION No.47 of 2022
                 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-80 Year-2008 Thana- RAMGARHWA District- East Champaran
                 ======================================================
                 Sheikh Safi Ahmad @ Shekh Safi Ahemand Son of Late SK. Taiyab @ Shekh
                 Taiyab Resident of Village - Bela P.S. - Ramgarhwa District - East
                 Champaran.

                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    Jalaluddin Son of Late Mainuddin @ Late Shekh Mainuddin Resident of
                 Village - Bela Sheikh Toli, P.S. - Ramgarhwa District - East Champaran.
           3.    Ruhul Haq @ Ruhul Haque Son of Late Alimuddin Resident of Village -
                 Bela Sheikh Toli, P.S. - Ramgarhwa District - East Champaran.
           4.    Aman @ Amin Son of Late Alimuddin Resident of Village - Bela Sheikh
                 Toli, P.S. - Ramgarhwa District - East Champaran.

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :        Mr. Vijay Shankar Shrivastava, Advocate
                 For the Respondent/s   :        Mr. Jagdhar Prasad, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

5   18-02-2026                 The petitioner has preferred the instant revision

                   petition against the judgment and order dated 02.11.2021 passed

                   in Criminal Appeal No. 76 of 2017 by the learned Additional

                   Sessions Judge, East Champaran, Motihari, whereby and

                   whereunder the learned appellate court dismissed the appeal of

                   the petitioner and affirmed the judgment and order dated

                   25.08.2017 passed by the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class,

                   Raxaul, East Champaran, Motihari in G.R. No. 389 of 2008

                   (Trial No. 894 of 2017), CIS No. 9119 of 2015 arising out of

                   Ramgarhwa P.S. Case No. 80 of 2008, by which opposite party
Patna High Court CR. REV. No.47 of 2022(5) dt.18-02-2026
                                             2/3




          Nos. 2 to 4 were acquitted by the learned trial court.

                       02. Section 372 r/w 378(2)(b) and 401(4) of the Code

          of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Section 413 r/w 419(2)(b) and

          442(4) of BNSS, 2023) prescribes that an appeal would lie

          against the impugned judgment and orders. Further, the Co-

          ordinate Bench of this Court vide judgment dated 04.04.2025

          passe in Criminal Revision No. 105 of 2019 (Rekha Devi Vs.

          The State of Bihar & Ors.) has also come to the finding that in

          such circumstances, the remedy to petitioner is to file Criminal

          Appeal to this Court under the Proviso to Section 372 Cr.PC. At

          the same time, Section 401(5) of of Cr.P.C. provides that where

          under this Code an appeal lies but an application for revision

          has been made to the High Court by any person and the High

          Court is satisfied that such application was made under the

          erroneous belief that no appeal lies thereto and that it is

          necessary in the interests of justice so to do, the High Court may

          treat the application for revision as a petition of appeal and deal

          with the same accordingly.

                       03. Faced with the situation, the learned counsel for

          the petitioner seeks permission to convert the instant criminal

          revision petition into criminal appeal.

                       04. Permission is accorded.
           Patna High Court CR. REV. No.47 of 2022(5) dt.18-02-2026
                                                        3/3




                                  05. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to

                     convert the present criminal revision petition into criminal

                     appeal within a week.

                                  06. The office is directed to extend all cooperation to

                     the learned counsel for the petitioner towards conversion and

                     thereafter place the matter before appropriate Bench.



                                                       (Arun Kumar Jha, J)
Ashish/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.