Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

RANJAN YADAV @ KAUSHAL KUMARversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The court permitted withdrawal of the revision petition, directing that if no compromise exists the petitioner’s application under Section 126(2) Cr.PC will be considered and he must pay half of the maintenance amount.

Summary

The petitioner Ranjan Yadav filed a criminal revision seeking to set aside an ex‑parte maintenance order dated 15‑10‑2019 passed by the Family Court under Section 125 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The order required him to pay Rs.5,000 per month to his estranged wife and their two minor children, but he was unable to contest the petition as it proceeded without his participation. The petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the revision and instead apply under the proviso to Section 126(2) Cr.PC for setting aside the order, offering to pay half of the maintenance amount pending a hearing. The court allowed the withdrawal, conditioned that if no settlement exists the application under Section 126(2) will be entertained and the petitioner must pay half the ordered amount. Consequently, the revision petition was disposed of.

Issues considered

  • Whether an ex‑parte maintenance order under Section 125 Cr.PC can be set aside by a revision petition.
  • Whether the petitioner may withdraw the revision petition and seek relief under the proviso to Section 126(2) Cr.PC.
  • Whether the petitioner is liable to pay a portion of the maintenance amount pending settlement.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • maintenance
  • Section 125 CrPC
  • ex‑parte order
  • revision
  • Family Court
  • Section 126(2) CrPC
  • withdrawal of petition

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                        CRIMINAL REVISION No.69 of 2020
                                 Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-0 Thana- District- Saharsa
                 ======================================================
                 Ranjan Yadav @ Kaushal Kumar Son of Shyam Sundar Prasad Yadav,
                 Resident of Village - Bariyahi, P.S.- Bangaon, District - Saharsa.
                                                                               ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
           1.     The State of Bihar
           2.    Rinku Devi Wife of Ranjan Yadav @ Kaushal Kumar Resident of Village -
                 Bariyahi, P.S.- Bangaon District - Saharsa Presently Residing at Maharatha,
                 P.S.- Saharsa, District - Saharsa
           3.    Rishabh Kumar Son of Ranjan Yadav @ Kaushal Kumar Through its mother
                 Rinku Devi, Resident of Village - Bariyahi, P.S.- Bangaon District - Saharsa
                 Presently Residing at Maharatha, P.S.- Saharsa, District - Saharsa
           4.     Rishu Kumari Daughter of Ranjan Yadav @ Kaushal Kumar Through its
                  mother Rinku Devi, Resident of Village - Bariyahi, P.S.- Bangaon District -
                  Saharsa Presently Residing at Maharatha, P.S.- Saharsa, District - Saharsa
                                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s       :        Mr. Satish Kumar Singh, Advocate
                                                     Mr. Dinesh Maharaj, Advocate
                 For the State              :        Md. Iftekhar Mahmood, APP
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

7   16-01-2026                   The case is at the stage of Admission.

                                 2. The present petition has been filed for setting aside

                   the ex-parte final maintenance order dated 15.10.2019, passed

                   by learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Saharsa in Misc. Case

                   No. 53 of 2016, filed under Section 125 Cr.PC.

                                 3. The Opposite Party No. 2 and her two minor

                   children, who are O.P. Nos. 3 & 4, had filed the said Misc. Case

                   for monthly maintenance of Rs. 15,000/- from the petitioner

                   herein, who is husband of O.P. No. 2 herein and father of O.P.

                   Nos. 3 & 4.

                                 4. As per the impugned order, it transpires that
Patna High Court CR. REV. No.69 of 2020(7) dt.16-01-2026
                                             2/3




          initially, the petitioner herein appeared in the case on notice

          before the Family Court and after some time, on account of

          reconciliation, the O.P. No. 2 along with her minor children

          started living with the petitioner herein and he was under

          impression that the case would get terminated. However, the

          case proceeded and order was passed ex-parte and the petitioner

          could not file his reply to the maintenance petition, nor could he

          adduce any evidence in support of his defence against the

          maintenance petition.

                       5. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner is

          seeking permission to withdraw the present petition and file

          appropriate application under Proviso to Section 126(2) of

          Cr.PC for setting aside the ex-parte order. The petitioner is also

          ready to pay half of the maintenance amount in terms of the

          impugned order at the time of setting aside the impugned order

          and proceeding further giving opportunity to the petitioner to

          file his reply and evidence and cross-examination of the

          witnesses of O.P. Nos. 2, 3 and 4.

                       6. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioner

          submits that for the last two years, he is not in contact with the

          petitioner herein and he is not in a position to say whether there

          is any compromise between the parties and they are living
           Patna High Court CR. REV. No.69 of 2020(7) dt.16-01-2026
                                                        3/3




                     together or not. He is also seeking liberty that in case the parties

                     have already entered into settlement and living together, there

                     should be provision that he will be not required to pay any

                     amount towards maintenance.

                                  7. Hence, permission is granted to the petitioner to

                     withdraw the present petition, subject to condition that if there is

                     no compromise already entered into between the parties, learned

                     Court below will consider the application of the petitioner, if

                     filed under Proviso to Section 126(2) of Cr.PC, and will be

                     entertained and at the time of setting aside the impugned order

                     for proceeding further, the petitioner will be required to pay half

                     of the total maintenance amount in terms of impugned order as

                     per which the petitioner herein has been directed to pay Rs.

                     5,000/- per month to the private opposite parties towards their

                     maintenance.

                                  8. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed

                     of.

                                  9. LCR is already received by this Court and hence,

                     the office is directed to send back the same forthwith along with

                     a copy of this order.


                                                                      (Jitendra Kumar, J.)
ravishankar/-
U       T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.