Patna High Court
XXXX JuvenileversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- ALLOWED
- Bench
- CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
Holding
The order refusing bail to the juvenile is set aside and bail is granted subject to conditions.
Summary
The Patna High Court entertained a criminal revision filed by a juvenile (aged 16 years 11 months) who had been denied bail by the Special Children Court in a case under Sections 309(4) and 310(2) of the BNS. The juvenile was not named in the FIR; his alleged involvement emerged from a co‑accused's confession, and no material was recovered from him. The petitioner argued that the juvenile had a clean antecedent, was in an observation home, and his father was willing to act as surety and supervise him. Relying on the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 and the precedent set in Lalu Kumar v. State of Bihar, the court held that bail for a juvenile can be denied only on three specific grounds, none of which were satisfied. Consequently, the High Court set aside the lower court’s order, allowed the revision, and granted bail on a Rs. 25,000 bond with two sureties, one being the father, subject to an affidavit undertaking.
Issues considered
- Whether the refusal to grant bail to a juvenile under Sections 309(4) and 310(2) of the BNS is consistent with the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015.
- Whether the three conditions laid down in Lalu Kumar v. State of Bihar for denying bail to a juvenile are met in the present case.
- Whether the juvenile’s age, clean antecedent, and availability of parental surety justify the grant of bail.
Legislation cited
Subjects
- bail
- juvenile
- criminal revision
- Juvenile Justice Act
- non‑bailable offence
- social investigation report
- surety
- observation home
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL REVISION No.904 of 2025
Arising Out of PS. Case No.-185 Year-2024 Thana- MEHANDIGANJ District- Patna
======================================================
XXXX Juvenile Natural Guardian S/o- Md. Dhamin @ Guddu @ Md.
Shamim Khan S/o- Md. Aslam, R/o- Mohalla- Chik Toli PS-Chow Dist-
Patna
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Rajeev Kumar
For the Respondent/s : Mr.Md. Nazir Ansari
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA SHEKHAR JHA
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 10-06-2026
Heard the parties.
2. The present application is being preferred against
the order dated 11.07.2025 passed by learned Spl. Children
Court- cum- District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1 st Patna, in
connection with Mehdiganj P.S. Case No. 185 of 2024 for
the offences punishable under Sections 309(4), 310(2) of
BNS by which the learned Court has refused to enlarge the
petitioner on bail.
3. The Child in conflict with law (for short
‘CICL’)/petitioner, aged about 16 years 11 month on the
alleged date of occurrence, is not named in F.I.R. and is in
observation home since 15.01.2025.
Patna High Court CR. REV. No.904 of 2025 dt.10-06-2026
2/5
4. As per FIR, six unknown miscreants entered
forcefully in the house of the informant and after confining
the informant and his daughter-in-law in a room looted the
household articles, jewelries along with cash of Rs. 1.5
Lakhs.
5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the
CICL/petitioner submitted that petitioner/CICL was not
named in the FIR, and his name surfaced during
investigation on the basis of confessional statement of co-
accused Md. Chand @ Maya Bhai who has already granted
regular bail by this Court through Cr. Misc. No. 36432 of
2025 dated 09.10.2025 It is pointed out that admittedly
recovery was not made from the possession of this petitioner
and he is also a man of clean antecedent. It is further
pointed out that the Social Investigation Report, no where
reveals that CICL may not improve him in future as to join
the main stream of civilized society, therefore, there is no
harm to release the juvenile under the supervision and care
of his father, who is ready to extend his care and love to the
petitioner.
Patna High Court CR. REV. No.904 of 2025 dt.10-06-2026
3/5
6. Learned APP opposed the prayer for bail.
7. Having regard to the submissions and materials
showing that the CICL/petitioner has been adjudged juvenile
aged about 16 years 11 month on the alleged date of
occurrence, and also as CICL/petitioner has remained in the
Observation Home since 15.01.2025 and his father is ready
to stand as a surety and furnish an undertaking that if
released on bail he will take care of the CICL/petitioner and
shall ensure that he does not fall in bad company and, in
case, the petitioner indulges in any unlawful act, he will
inform it to the jurisdictional police station as also following
the spirit of section 12 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and
Protection of Children) Act, 2015 and in view of the
exceptions carved out by the Hon’ble Division Bench of this
Court in the case of Lalu Kumar and Ors. Vs. The State
of Bihar reported in 2019 (4) PLJR 833 that classification
of the offences under the bailable and non-bailable sections
would not be relevant for the purpose of grant of bail to a
juvenile and the prayer for bail of a juvenile may be rejected
only under one of the three conditions, which are as under:-
Patna High Court CR. REV. No.904 of 2025 dt.10-06-2026
4/5
“(i) The release is likely to bring that person into
association with any known criminal;
(ii) The release is likely to expose the said person
to moral or physiological danger; and
(iii) The release would defeat the ends of justice.”
8. Having regard to the submissions made by the
parties and taking into consideration the materials on record
as well as the period of incarceration of the petitioner/CICL
and in the best interest of CICL, this Court is of the
considered view that the impugned order passed by the court
below is not in consonance with the aims and objectives of
the Act. Even social investigation report suggest scope of
reform and nothing adverse was noticed against him.
9. In view of the aforesaid facts and
circumstances, as petitioner/CICL was found 16 years 11
month on the date of occurrence, coupled with the fact that
charge-sheet has already been submitted, where Social
Investigation Report (SIR) nowhere suggest that
CICL/petitioner cannot be reformed in future as to join the
main stream of society, accordingly, the order dated
11.07.2025 passed by learned Spl. Children Court- cum-
District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1st Patna, in connection
Patna High Court CR. REV. No.904 of 2025 dt.10-06-2026
5/5
with Mehdiganj P.S. Case No. 185 of 2024 is hereby set
aside.
10.The criminal revision application stands allowed.
11. Let the CICL-petitioner, named-above, be
released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/-
(Rupees Twenty-five Thousand only) with two sureties of
the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Spl.
Children Court- cum- District and Addl. Sessions Judge 1 st
Patna, in connection with Mehdiganj P.S. Case No. 185 of
2024 on the following conditions:-
(i) That one of the sureties should be the
father of the CICL/petitioner; and
(ii) That the father of the CICL/petitioner shall
file an affidavit before the learned Juvenile
Justice Board, Patna, giving specific
undertaking that after release of the
CICL/petitioner on bail, he will take proper
care of the petitioner and will not allow him to
fall into bad company.
(Chandra Shekhar Jha, J)
Sudha/-
AFR/NAFR NAFR
CAV DATE NA
Uploading Date 10.06.2026
Transmission Date 10.06.2026
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.