Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Vikash Kumar ChaubeyversusThe State of Bihar through the Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna, Patel Bhawan, Bailey Raod,

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

The writ application fails and is dismissed.

Summary

The petitioner, Vikash Kumar Chaubey, filed a criminal writ petition before the Patna High Court seeking relief for a female corpus who alleged she was being pressured to marry and wished to live with her parents. The corpus's statement, recorded before a Sub-Inspector, indicated her desire to stay with her parents. The Court examined the corpus's testimony and found no basis to grant the writ. Consequently, the petition was dismissed and the corpus was ordered to return to her parents.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition seeking protection of the corpus's personal liberty and right to live with her parents is maintainable under the High Court's criminal writ jurisdiction.

Subjects

  • writ jurisdiction
  • personal liberty
  • marriage pressure
  • protective order
  • Bihar
  • High Court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                 Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1345 of 2026
                 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-322 Year-2026 Thana- BUXAR COMPLAINT CASE District-
                                                         Buxar
                 ======================================================
                 Vikash Kumar Chaubey, Son of Kamleshwar Chaubey, Resident of Village -
                 Chaubey Chak, P.O.- Namaj, P.S.- Brahmpur, District - Buxar, Bihar
                                                                             ... ... Petitioner
                                                    Versus
           1.     The State of Bihar through the Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna,
                  Patel Bhawan, Bailey Raod, Patna.
           2.    The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna, Patel Bhawan, Bailey Road,
                 Patna.
           3.    The Superintendent of Police, Buxar
           4.    The S.H.O., Police Station Brahmpur, Buxar
           5.    Dadan Yadav, Son of Hareram Yadav, Resident of Village - Baluan, P.S.-
                 Brahmpur, District - Buxar
           6.    Sanjit Yadav @ Rakesh Yadav, Son of Hareram Yadav, Resident of Village -
                 Baluan, P.S.- Brahmpur, District - Buxar
           7.    Guddu Yadav, Son of Ras Bihari Yadav, Resident of Village - Baluan, P.S.-
                 Brahmpur, District - Buxar
           8.     Sitaram Yadav, Son of Ras Bihari Yadav, Resident of Village - Baluan, P.S.-
                  Brahmpur, District - Buxar
                                                                           ... ... Respondents
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner      :       Ms. Smriti Kumari, Advocate
                                                 Mr. Maya Shankar Mishra, Advocate
                 For the State           :       Ms. Priya Gupta, AC to AG
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD
                         and
                         HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KUMAR MANISH
                                       ORAL ORDER

                 (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD)

3   08-07-2026                     The corpus has been produced before this Court. The

                   petitioner along with his lawyer is present.

                                 2. This Court has interacted with the corpus. Learned

                   AC to AG has produced the statement of the corpus made before

                   the Sub-Inspector of Police, Rajiv Nagar, Patna. Let it be kept
        Patna High Court CR. WJC No.1345 of 2026(3) dt.08-07-2026
                                                    2/2




                  on the record.

                              3. The corpus submits that she was put under pressure

                  to marry earlier. It appears from her statements as also from the

                  interactions, we have with her that she wants to live with her

                  parents.

                              4. In such circumstance, this writ application fails. It

                  is dismissed accordingly.

                              5. The corpus is set at-free to go with her parents.



                                        (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)


                                             ( Kumar Manish, J)
SUSHMA2/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.