Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Shakeela ParveenversusThe State of Bihar through the Home Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

Since the detainee has been released, the alleged illegal confinement no longer exists and the writ of habeas corpus is not maintainable.

Summary

Petitioner Shakeela Parveen filed a writ petition seeking a habeas corpus order for the production of her son, Fahad Hamza, alleging illegal detention in violation of Article 22 of the Constitution. The petition alleged that the respondents, including various police officials, had detained the son without lawful authority. During the hearing, the court was informed that the son had already been released pursuant to an order dated 04-09-2025. The court held that with the release, the alleged illegal confinement no longer existed. Consequently, the writ application was dismissed and the petition was disposed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the court can grant a writ of habeas corpus when the alleged detainee has already been released

Subjects

  • habeas corpus
  • illegal detention
  • Article 22
  • criminal writ jurisdiction
  • release of detainee

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2285 of 2025
                 ======================================================
                 Shakeela Parveen Daughter of Dr. Abdul Gafoor Resident of village-
                 Indrapuri Samanpura Colony, Raja Bazar, PS- Shastri Nagar District -Patna
                                                                            ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus
           1.     The State of Bihar through the Home Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna Bihar
           2.    The Home Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna
           3.    The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna
           4.    The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna
           5.    The Superintendent of Police, Patna
           6.    The Officer-in-Charge, Shastri Nagar Ps, Patna
           7.    The Director General of Police, Haryana, Haryana Police headquarters,
                 Sector 6, Panchkula, Haryana 134108
           8.     Officer-in-charge Cyber Crime Ps, Sector 8, District Kurukshetra, Haryana
                                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s    :         Mr. Harsh Singh, Advocate
                                                   Mr. Abhijeet, Advocate
                 For the Respondent/s    :         Mr. Prabhu Narayan Sharma, AC to AG
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH
                         and
                         HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
                                       ORAL ORDER

                 (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH)

5   13-02-2026                     The present writ application has been filed for the

                   following reliefs:

                                              i)      To     issue     an     appropriate
                                    writ/order/direction in the nature of Habeas
                                    Corpus thereby directing the Respondents to
                                    produce before the Hon’ble Court Petitioner’s
                                    son, namely, Fahad Hamza, s/o Shakeel Najmi,
                                    r/o 2 E, Namaskar Enclave, P.S. Patliputra,
                                    District Patna, currently residing with the
                                    Petitioner at Petitioner’s address at Indrapuri,
            Patna High Court CR. WJC No.2285 of 2025(5) dt.13-02-2026
                                                        2/2




                                      Samanpura Colony, Raja Bazar, P.S. Shastri
                                      Nagar, District Patna, who has been arrested
                                      and detained by the Respondents in gross
                                      violation of Article 22 of the Constitution of
                                      India.
                                                  ii) To any other relief or reliefs for
                                      which the Petitioner is found entitled to in facts
                                      and circumstances of the case.


                                  2. During the course of arguments, it has been brought

                      to the notice of this Court that in compliance with the order

                      dated 04.09.2025, the detenue has already been released.

                                  3. In view of the fact that the detenue has already been

                      released, the question of illegal confinement/custody no longer

                      survives for consideration.

                                  4. Accordingly, the present writ application stands

                      disposed of.

                                  5. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed

                      of.



                                                  (Sudhir Singh, J)


                                            ( Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
Anushka/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.