Patna High Court
Pravesh @ Prabhash YadavversusThe State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- ARUN KUMAR JHA
Holding
The Court directed the respondents to place the petitioner's matter before the State Sentence Remission Board for consideration of premature release within a stipulated time.
Summary
Pravesh Yadav, convicted under IPC section 302 and Arms Act section 27(1) and sentenced to life imprisonment with additional remission, filed a criminal writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the authorities to consider his premature release. The State respondents indicated that they would obtain fresh reports from the Probation Officer, Presiding Officer and Superintendent of Police before forwarding the proposal to the prison headquarters and the State Sentence Remission Board. The petitioner had already spent over sixteen years in actual custody and more than twenty years including remission as of February 2026. The High Court held that the respondents must place the petitioner's case before the State Sentence Remission Board within four weeks of receiving the order and that the Board should decide within six weeks. Accordingly, the petition was disposed with the direction to consider premature release in accordance with law.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is entitled to a writ of mandamus directing the authorities to consider his premature release.
- Whether the statutory authorities have a duty to forward the petitioner's remission proposal to the State Sentence Remission Board.
Legislation cited
- Arms Act — s. 27(1)
- Indian Penal Code — s. 302
Subjects
- criminal writ
- mandamus
- premature release
- sentence remission
- life imprisonment
- IPC 302
- Arms Act 27(1)
- High Court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.257 of 2026
======================================================
Pravesh @ Prabhash Yadav S/o Bishundeo Yadav, R/o Village- Harpur, P.S-
Harpur, Distt.- Munger.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna
Bihar
2. The State Sentence Remission Board through the Principle Secretary, Home
Department, Govt. of Bihar Patna
3. The Joint Secretary cum Director (Administration) Home Department
(Prison), Bihar, Patna. Bihar
4. The Secretary, Law Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. Bihar
5. The Additional Director General of Police, Criminal Investigation
Department, Bihar Patna
6. The Inspector General, Jail and Reforms Services, Bihar Patna
7. The Assistant Inspector General, Jail and Reforms Service, Bihar Patna
8. The Jail Superintendent, Open Jail, Buxar. Bihar
... ... Respondents
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate
For the Respondent/s : Mr. S.C.1
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 18-06-2026
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
2. The present criminal writ petition has been filed
seeking following reliefs:
“For issuance of an appropriate writ in the
nature of Mandamus commanding and directing
the respondent authorities to consider the case of
the petitioner for premature release and released
him in connection with Sessions Trial No. 358 of
2010 which amalgamated with Sessions Trial No.
862 of 2008 arising out of Harpur P.S. Case No. 2
of 2008 in which the petitioner was held guilty and
convicted by judgment of conviction dated
Patna High Court CR. WJC No.257 of 2026 dt.18-06-2026
2/3
25.05.2015 for the charges under section 302 of
the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and section 27 (1) of
the Arms Act and sentenced by order dated
29.05.2015 to undergo life imprisonment along
with fine of Rs. 5000/- for the offence under section
302 of the Indian Penal Code, in default of fine, six
months simple imprisonment and further sentenced
to undergo three years RI for offence under Arms
Act and a fine of Rs. 1000/- and in default of
paying of fine one month SI.”
3. In the counter-affidavit filed by the State
respondents it has been submitted that as soon as fresh reports
are received from Probation Officer, Presiding Officer and
Superintendent of Police concerned, the proposal for premature
release of the petitioner would be sent to the prison headquarter
and then further action would be taken and the matter would be
put up before Remission Board for its consideration. From the
same counter-affidavit it appears the petitioner has already
suffered incarceration in actual custody for a period of sixteen
years, four months and fourteen days and with remission he has
remained under incarceration for twenty years, three months and
twenty-nine days as on 12.02.2026.
4. In the light of the aforementioned facts and
circumstances, the concerned respondent authorities are directed
to place the matter of the petitioner for his premature release
before the State Sentence Remission Board after obtaining
necessary reports from the statutory authorities, if required, at
Patna High Court CR. WJC No.257 of 2026 dt.18-06-2026
3/3
the earliest and preferably within four weeks from the date of
the receipt / production of copy of the present order. Thereafter,
appropriate decision in the matter of the petitioner be taken by
the State Remission Board in accordance with law within a
period of next six weeks.
5. With the aforesaid observation / direction, the
present criminal writ petition stands disposed of.
(Arun Kumar Jha, J)
Shahnawaz/-
AFR/NAFR NAFR
CAV DATE N/A
Uploading Date 19.06.2026
Transmission Date 19.06.2026
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.