Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Gagandev PaswanversusThe Union Of India Through The Ministry Of Rail, Rail Bhawan, New Delhi and Ors

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The petition is disposed of, allowing the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition and file a criminal revision petition.

Summary

The petitioner, Gagandev Paswan, filed a criminal writ petition seeking quash of FIR No.1096 of 2017 registered under Section 153 of the Railways Act. The FIR had led to a charge-sheet and cognizance was taken against the petitioner. The petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the writ petition and instead file a criminal revision petition against the cognizance order. The Court considered whether the petition could be withdrawn and the petitioner could be allowed to pursue a revision remedy. The Court granted the petitioner's request, disposing of the writ petition and permitting the filing of a criminal revision petition.

Issues considered

  • Whether the criminal writ petition seeking quash of the FIR can be withdrawn in favour of filing a criminal revision petition against the cognizance order

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • Criminal writ
  • Quash FIR
  • Railways Act
  • Cognizance
  • Revision petition

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.389 of 2018
                 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1096 Year-2017 Thana- MANSI RPF/POST District- Khagaria
                 ======================================================
                 Gagandev Paswan S/o Late Dhana Paswan, R/o Village- Madarpur, P.S.-
                 Maheshpur, District- Khagaria, Bihar.

                                                                                   ... ... Petitioner
                                              Versus
           1.    The Union Of India Through The Ministry Of Rail, Rail Bhawan, New
                 Delhi
           2.    The Director General of Police, Railway Production Force, New Delhi.
           3.    The Commandant, Railway Protection Force, Barauni, Begusarai, Bihar.
           4.    The Incharge Inspector, Railway Protection Force, Barauni, Begusarai,
                 Bihar.
           5.    The Junior Engineer, Path Way P.W., East Central Railway, Manshi
                 Khagaria.

                                                           ... ... Respondents
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner     :        Mr. Pankaj Kumar Jha, Advocate
                 For the Respondents    :        Mr. Nilanjan Chatterjee, Advocate
                                                 Mr. Ujjwal Raj, Advocate
                                                 Mr. Sahil Kumar, Advocate
                                                 Mr. Anirvan Choudhari, Advocate
                                                 Mr. Jyoti Prakash, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

5   07-01-2026                    The present Criminal Writ Petition has been filed

                   by    the    Petitioner     for    quashing       of    the    FIR     bearing

                   RPF/Post/Mansi P.S. Case No.1096 of 2017, registered for the

                   offences punishable under Section 153 of the Railways Act.

                               2. However, in this case charge-sheet was submitted

                   after completion of investigation and even cognizance has been

                   taken against the Petitioner.

                               3. Learned counsel for the Petitioner is seeking
            Patna High Court CR. WJC No.389 of 2018(5) dt.07-01-2026
                                                        2/2




                      permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file

                      Criminal Revision Petition against the cognizance order.

                                   4. Accordingly, the present petition stands disposed of

                      with the aforesaid liberty to the Petitioner, as sought for.



                                                                       (Jitendra Kumar, J.)
Chandan/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.