Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sunaina DeviversusThe State Of Bihar Through Superintendent Of Police, Muzaffarpur and Ors

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn and infructuous.

Summary

The petitioner, Sunaina Devi, filed a criminal writ petition challenging actions of the State and another respondent. During the proceedings, the petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition, citing that the police had accepted the final form and the related complaint case had been dismissed. The court considered the request to determine whether the petition had become infructuous. Upon review, the court found that the petitioner’s objectives had been achieved and the petition no longer served any purpose. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn and infructuous.

Issues considered

  • Whether a criminal writ petition can be withdrawn after the police final form is accepted and the related complaint case is dismissed

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • criminal procedure
  • final form
  • infructuous

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                 Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.422 of 2018
                    Arising Out of PS. Case No.-118 Year-2017 Thana- AHIYAPUR District- Muzaffarpur
                 ======================================================
                 Sunaina Devi, Wife of Late Devan Prasad Sinha, Resident of Village-
                 Bagmali Khata Jangi, P.S.- Sadar, Post- Hajipur, District- Vaishali.

                                                                                    ... ... Petitioner
                                                  Versus
            1.   The State of Bihar Through Superintendent Of Police, Muzaffarpur
            2.   Meena Devi, Wife of Late Pramod Kumar Sinha, Resident of Village-
                 Kolua, Yadav Chawk Near Garam Chowk, Post- Paigambarpur Kolhua, P.S.-
                 Ahiyapur, District- Muzaffarpur.

                                                           ... ... Respondents
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner      :        Mr. Kalyan Shankar, Advocate
                                                  Ms. Smita Sreeyash, Advocate
                 For the State           :        Mr. Md. N. H. Khan, SC-I
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

5   08-01-2026                        Learned counsel for the Petitioner is seeking

                   permission to withdraw the present writ petition in view of final

                   form filed by the police being accepted and even the Complaint

                   Case arising out of the protest petition being dismissed.

                                 2. Hence, the present petition is dismissed as

                   withdrawn/infructuous.



                                                                    (Jitendra Kumar, J.)
Chandan/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.