Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

SHIVA NARAYAN SINGHversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
CONVERTED

Holding

Judicial orders cannot be challenged under Article 226 writ jurisdiction, and petitions under Article 227 must be filed as criminal miscellaneous petitions.

Summary

The petitioners challenged a 2022 order of the 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Darbhanga, which had rejected their criminal revision against a 2020 order of the SDM, Sadar, Darbhanga. They filed a writ petition under Article 226 and Article 227 of the Constitution in the Patna High Court, seeking relief against the judicial order. The Court noted Supreme Court precedents that judicial orders are not amenable to writ proceedings under Article 226 and that Article 227 jurisdiction is distinct and must be pursued under criminal miscellaneous jurisdiction as per Patna High Court Rules. Consequently, the Court granted permission to convert the criminal writ petition into a criminal miscellaneous petition. The petitioners were directed to effect the conversion within two weeks, and the Court ordered cooperation from the office.

Issues considered

  • Whether a judicial order can be challenged through a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution
  • Whether a petition invoking Article 227 must be filed under criminal miscellaneous jurisdiction as per Patna High Court Rules

Subjects

  • Article 226
  • Article 227
  • writ jurisdiction
  • criminal miscellaneous jurisdiction
  • Patna High Court Rules
  • conversion of petition
  • jurisdictional limitation

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.469 of 2022
                             Arising Out of PS. Case No.- Year-0 Thana- District- Darbhanga
                 ======================================================
                 Shiva Narayan Singh & Anr.

                                                                                     ... ... Petitioners
                                                        Versus
                 The State of Bihar & Ors.

                                                           ... ... Respondents
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioners     :        Mr. Prashant Sinha, Advocate
                 For the Respondents     :        Mr. Md. Khurshid Alam, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   12-01-2026                    Heard the parties.

                                  2. The petitioners have challenged the order dated

                   22.02.2022 passed by the 1st Additional Sessions Judge,

                   Darbhanga in Cr. Revision No. 77 of 2020, whereby the

                   criminal revision preferred by the petitioners against the order

                   dated 21.01.2020 passed by learned SDM, Sadar, Darbhanga in

                   M.R. No. 2797 of 2019 has been rejected.

                                  3. The petitioner has approached this Court in its

                   writ jurisdiction under Article 226 and also under Article 227 of

                   the Constitution of India challenging a judicial order. The

                   Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Neeta Singh & Ors. v.

                   The State of Uttar Pradesh & Ors., in Special Leave to Appeal

                   (Crl.) No(s). 13578 of 2024, reported in 2024 SCC OnLine SC

                   5761 has held that judicial orders are not amenable to challenge
Patna High Court CR. WJC No.469 of 2022(4) dt.12-01-2026
                                            2/3




          in writ proceeding. So far as filing of the writ petition under

          Article 227 of the Constitution of India is concerned, the

          Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Radhey Shyam & Anr. v.

          Chhabi Nath & Ors., reported in (2015) 5 SCC 423 has held

          that jurisdiction under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is

          distinct from writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the

          Constitution of India. The Hon’ble Supreme Court further in the

          same case that in some High Courts there is tendency of

          entertaining petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of

          India by terming them as writ petition. In Part A, Chapter XII,

          Sub Rule (v) of Rule 3 of Patna High Court Rules provide as

          under:

                          “(v) Petitioner under Article-227 of the
                          Constitution of India in respect of any order or any
                          proceeding before any Criminal Court would be
                          filed in Criminal Miscellaneous Jurisdiction.”

                          Therefore, a petition under Article 227 of the

          Constitution of India needs to be filed under Criminal

          Miscellaneous jurisdiction. It is also pertinent to note here that

          the roster of Article 227 of the Constitution of India has not

          been assigned to this Court.

                          4. Faced with this situation, learned counsel for the

          petitioner seeks permission to convert the present Criminal Writ

          Jurisdiction petition into Criminal Miscellaneous petition.
          Patna High Court CR. WJC No.469 of 2022(4) dt.12-01-2026
                                                      3/3




                                    5. Permission, as prayed for, is accorded.

                                    6. Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to

                    convert the present Criminal Writ Jurisdiction petition into

                    Criminal Miscellaneous petition within a period of two weeks.

                                    7. Office is directed to extend all cooperation

                    towards the conversion.



                                                            (Arun Kumar Jha, J)

Shahnawaz/-

U     T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.