Patna High Court
M/s PBC Infrastructure (India) Pvt. Ltd.,versusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
Holding
The Court granted permission to withdraw the application and dismissed it as infructuous.
Summary
The petitioner, M/s PBC Infrastructure (India) Pvt. Ltd., filed an application seeking the Court’s permission to withdraw the pending writ petition. The petitioner’s counsel, Mr. Gyan Prakash, requested that the Court allow the withdrawal as the matter had become infructuous. The Court examined whether such permission could be granted under procedural law. Finding no impediment, the Court accorded the permission to withdraw. Consequently, the application was dismissed as infructuous.
Issues considered
- Whether the Court may grant permission to withdraw a pending writ application and dismiss it as infructuous
Subjects
- withdrawal of application
- infructuous
- civil writ jurisdiction
- procedural law
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10344 of 2025
======================================================
M/s PBC Infrastructure (India) Pvt. Ltd., registered under Companies act
having its registered office at 699C Eldeco Udyaan 2, Raibareli Road,
Lucknow, U.P through its Power Of Attorney Holder-Anuj Kumar Maurya,
(Male), aged about-30 Years, S/o Radhe Shyam Maurya, Vill.- Nariyawan,
Post- Rajapur Bindhan, Nariyawan, Distt- Pratapgarh, Uttar Pradesh-230128,.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Old
Secretariate, Patna.
2. Additional Chief Secretary, Road Construction Department, Bihar.
3. Engineer-in-Chief (M.C), Road Construction Department, Patna, Bihar.
4. Chief Engineer, South, Road Construction Department, Patna, Bihar.
5. Secretary to Chief Engineer, South, Road Construction Department, Patna,
Bihar.
6. Superintending Engineer, Bhojpur Path Anchal, Aara, Bihar.
7. Executive Engineer, Shahabad Road Division, Ara.
... ... Respondents
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Gyan Prakash, Advocate
For the State : Mr. AC to AG
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH
ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH)
3 22-04-2026 Mr. Gyan Prakash, learned counsel for the petitioner
seeks permission to withdraw this application as the same has
become infructuous.
2. Permission is accorded.
3. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed as
having become infructuous.
(Sudhir Singh, J.)
(Shailendra Singh, J.)
Gaurav Kumar/-
U
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.