Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Mamta DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The Court granted liberty to file a revision petition under Section 93 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, and disposed of the writ petition.

Summary

Mamta Devi filed a writ petition seeking to quash orders dated 14‑01‑2025 of the Excise Commissioner and 16‑10‑2024 of the Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Bhagalpur. She requested liberty to challenge those appellate orders by filing a revision petition under Section 93 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. The High Court granted the liberty, directing that if the revision is filed within four weeks, the revisional authority must consider it on merits without being barred by limitation and must issue a reasoned order within six weeks. The Court emphasized the procedural timeline and the authority of the revisional forum. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of on the terms of the liberty granted.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner can be granted liberty to file a revision petition under Section 93 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.
  • Whether the limitation period would bar the filing of such a revision petition.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • excise
  • revision
  • limitation
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
  • civil writ jurisdiction

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10423 of 2025
                 ======================================================
                 Mamta Devi Wife of Santosh Sah Resident of Village- near Kali Mandir
                 Noorpur, Police Station- Nathnagar (Madhusudanpur), District- Bhagalpur.

                                                                           ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                  Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Excise and Prohibition
                 Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
           2.    The Excise Commissioner, Bihar, Patna.
           3.    The District Magistrate, Bhagalpur.
           4.    The Superintendent of Police, Bhagalpur.
           5.    The Superintendent of Excise, Bhagalpur.
           6.    The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Sadar Bhagalpur, District- Bhagalpur.
           7.    The S.H.O.,      Nathnagar    (Madhusudanpur)    Police   Station,   District-
                 Bhagalpur.

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr. Binay Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Respondent/s   :      Mr. Standing Counsel (22)
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH
                         and
                         HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

                 (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH)

3   19-01-2026                 Though the present writ petition has been filed for

                   quashing the order dated 14.01.2025 passed by the Excise

                   Commissioner, Bihar, Patna in Excise Appeal Case No. 119 of

                   2024 as also the order dated 16.10.2024 passed by the learned

                   Deputy      Collector,     Land     Reforms,    Sadar    Bhagalpur       in

                   Miscellaneous (Excise) Case No. 144 of 2022-2023, however, at

                   the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty on

                   behalf of the petitioner to challenge the aforesaid appellate order
           Patna High Court CWJC No.10423 of 2025(3) dt.19-01-2026
                                                      2/2




                     dated 14.01.2025 by filing appropriate revision petition under

                     Section 93 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

                     Liberty so sought is granted.

                                 2. It is needless to say that in case appropriate revision

                     petition is filed within a period of four weeks from today, the

                     Revisional Authority shall examine the same on merits without

                     being impeded by the issue of limitation and pass a reasoned

                     and a speaking order, in accordance with law within a period of

                     six weeks, thereafter.

                                 3. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands

                     disposed off on the aforesaid terms.



                                            (Mohit Kumar Shah, J)


                                               ( Praveen Kumar, J)
shivam/-

U      T


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.