Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Shahi SanjayversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court permitted the withdrawal of the writ petition and dismissed it as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Shahi Sanjay, filed a civil writ petition before the Patna High Court challenging actions of the State of Bihar and its agricultural department officials. While the petition was pending, the petitioner’s grievance was resolved amicably. Consequently, the petitioner’s counsel applied to withdraw the writ petition. The court considered the application and, noting the settlement of the grievance, granted permission to withdraw. The writ petition was thereafter dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether a civil writ petition may be withdrawn by the petitioner after the underlying grievance has been settled

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • civil procedure
  • high court
  • petition dismissed

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                  Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.109 of 2026
                  ======================================================
                  Shahi Sanjay S/o Late Janki Sharan Shahi, R/o Vill.-Mahmada, P.O. and P.S. -
                  Pusa, District-Samastipur.
                                                                            ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                     Versus
             1.    The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Department of Agriculture,
                   Government of Bihar, Patna.
             2.   The Director, Department of Agriculture, Government of Bihar, Patna.
             3.   The Joint Director, Department of Agriculture, Government of Bihar,
                  Muzaffarpur.
             4.   The Deputy Director, Agriculture Farm, Motihari.
             5.   The Joint Director, Department of Agriculture, Saharsa.
             6.   The Deputy Director, Agriculture.
                                                            ... ... Respondent/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s    :      Mr. Anshu Dhar Sharma, Advocate
                                                 Mrs. Namita Sharma, Advocate
                  For the Respondent/s    :      Mr. Kumar Manish, SC-05
                                                 Mr. Arun Kumar Prasad, AC to SC-5
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
                                        ORAL ORDER

4   06-04-2026                    Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel

                    for the State are present.

                                  2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during

                    pendency of the writ petition, the grievance of the petitioner has

                    settled. As such, he seeks permission to withdraw this application.

                                  3. Permission is accorded.

                                  4. This writ application is dismissed as withdrawn.

                                                                       (Dr. Anshuman, J)
    Mkr./-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.