Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Naresh Yadav @ Naresh PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court held that a petitioner may withdraw a writ petition and is at liberty to approach the appropriate authority for redress.

Summary

Naresh Yadav filed a civil writ petition before the Patna High Court challenging actions of the State of Bihar education officials. The petitioner sought relief against the respondents but later expressed a desire to withdraw the writ application. He requested liberty to approach the appropriate authority for redress of his grievances. The court considered the petitioner's request and the procedural propriety of allowing a withdrawal. It permitted the withdrawal of the writ petition and granted the petitioner liberty to approach the relevant authority. The matter was thereby concluded without further adjudication on the merits.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be withdrawn by the petitioner with liberty to approach the appropriate authority for redress

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • civil procedure
  • high court
  • state education department

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                  Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1121 of 2025


                 Naresh Yadav @ Naresh Prasad S/o Chandrika Yadav R/O Vill - Pakari, P.O.-
                 Mandil, P.S.- Paras Bigha, District- Jehanabad, Bihar

                                                                               ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department,
                 Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
           2.    The Director, Education Department (Primary), Government of Bihar, Patna.
           3.    The District Education Officer, Jehanabad.
           4.    The Block Education Officer, Jehanabad.

                                                                             ... ... Respondent/s


                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :       Mr.Umesh Kumar
                 For the State          :       Mr.Government Pleader (26)

                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA
                                    ORAL ORDER

3   16-03-2026                     Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the

                   learned counsel appearing for the respondent-State.

                                 2. After advancing some argument, the learned

                   counsel for the petitioner expresses desire to withdraw the

                   present writ application with liberty to move before appropriate

                   authority for redressal of his grievances.

                                 3. As prayed for, this writ application is permitted to
       Patna High Court CWJC No.1121 of 2025(3) dt.16-03-2026
                                                   2/2




                 be withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to move before the

                 appropriate authority for redressal of his grievances.



                                         (Alok Kumar Sinha, J)
HR/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.