Patna High Court
Yadunandaan RayversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISS FOR NON-PROSECUTION
Holding
The petition is dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
The petitioner, Yadunandaan Ray, filed a civil writ petition in the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar and several officials. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, and the respondent was represented by the Advocate General. The matter was taken up on 26‑02‑2026, but the petitioner still failed to appear. The Court observed that there was no prosecution of the petition. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition for non‑prosecution.
Issues considered
- Whether a civil writ petition can proceed in the absence of any representation by the petitioner
Subjects
- civil writ jurisdiction
- non‑prosecution
- petition dismissal
- high court
- absence of representation
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11340 of 2025
======================================================
Yadunandaan Ray Son of Basdev Ray Resident of Village-Ajbi Nagar, P.S.-
Mahammadpur, District- Gopalganj, Bihar-841416.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Government of
Bihar, Patna.
2. The Additinal Chief Secretary, Department of Panchayati Raj, Government
of Bihar, Patna.
3. The Divisional Commissioner, Saran Division, Chapra.
4. The Distirct Magistrate, Gopalganj.
5. The Deputy Development Commissioner, Gopalganj.
6. The Distirct Panchayti Raj Officer, Gopalganj.
7. The Block Development Officer, Baikunthpur, Gopalganj.
8. The Commissioner, MANREGA, Bihar, Patna.
9. The Panchayat Secretary, Ajbinagar Panchayat, District-Gopalganj, Bihar.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None
For the Respondent/s : Mr. P.K. Shahi, Advocate General
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)
5 02-04-2026 None appears on behalf of the petitioner.
2. When the matter was taken up on 26.02.2026, on
that day also nobody appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
3. The matter stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
(Sangam Kumar Sahoo, CJ)
(Harish Kumar, J)
supratim/-
U
Checking your session…