Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Manoj Kumar MehtaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The writ petition is disposed, directing the petitioner to approach the District Mining Officer within three days for a decision, implying that the seizure without a produced challan was improper.

Summary

Manoj Kumar Mehta, the owner of a truck carrying stone chips, challenged the seizure of his vehicle by mining officials in Nawada district, alleging that a valid challan had been issued by the Jharkhand authority but was not produced at the time of interception. The respondents contended that no challan was produced during the seizure and that the vehicle was therefore lawfully confiscated. The High Court examined the factual dispute over the existence and timing of the challan and noted a pattern of similar seizures being declared illegal in other cases. While the Court did not order the immediate release of the vehicle, it directed the petitioner to approach the District Mining Officer within three days for a prompt decision, and mandated that future interceptions be videographed to ensure transparency. The order was issued in the presence of the Mining Department’s special P.P. Mines officer, who was instructed to communicate the directions to the department.

Issues considered

  • The legality of seizing a vehicle when the driver fails to produce a valid challan at the time of interception
  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to immediate release of the seized vehicle pending adjudication
  • The appropriate procedural remedy for the petitioner to obtain relief from the seizure

Subjects

  • vehicle seizure
  • mining department
  • challan
  • procedural fairness
  • videography
  • transparency
  • civil writ jurisdiction

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1173 of 2026
                 ======================================================
                 Manoj Kumar Mehta Son of Shivnarayan Mehta, R/o Village-Lengrapipar,
                 Post-Domachanch, P.S.-Domachanch, District-Koderma, Jharkhand-825407.

                                                                           ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                   Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar through Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Mines
                 and Geology, Government of Bihar, Vikas Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.
           2.    The Director, Mines and Geology Deparmtent, Bihar, Patna.
           3.    The District Magistrate, Nawada.
           4.    The Assistant Director, Mines and Geology Department, Nawada.
           5.    The Mineral Development Officer, District Mining Office, Nawada.
           6.    The Mining Inspector, Nawada.
           7.    The S.H.O. Nemdarganj Police Station, Nawada.
           8.    The TATA AIG General Insurance Company Limited through legal manager,
                 Patna.

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :         Mr. Shambhu Narayan Singh, Adv.
                 For the State          :         Mr. Sajid Salim Khan, SC-25
                 For resp. no. 8        :         Mr. Santosh Kr. Jha, Adv.
                 For the Mines          :         Mr. Naresh Dikshit, Spl. P.P. Mines
                                                  Mr. Brij Bihari Tiwari, Adv.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   02-04-2026                    Heard Mr. Shambhu Narayan Singh, learned counsel

                   for the petitioner, Mr. Naresh Dikshit representing the Mines

                   Department, Mr. Sajid Salim Khan representing the State as also

                   Mr. Santosh Kr. Jha for the respondent no. 8.

                                 2. The present application has been preferred for the

                   following relief(s):

                                                       (i) for issuance of appropriate
                                            writ/writs,        direction/directions      and
                                            order/orders for quashing the illegal seizure
Patna High Court CWJC No.1173 of 2026(2) dt.02-04-2026
                                            2/7




                                 of     the       petitioner's      vehicle      bearing
                                 registration no. JH-12-K-9543, Engine no.
                                 ISBE5.91804081D63687929, and chassis no.
                                 MAT541061J3D13181 which is at Serial No.
                                 (4) of the seizure memo dated 11.01.2026
                                 which was seized by order dated 11.01.2026
                                 contained in letter no. 01/Kha.
                                              ii. for issuance of appropriate
                                 writ/writs,             direction/directions        and
                                 order/orders directing the immediate release
                                 of the petitioner's seized vehicle as its
                                 prolonged        seizure      is   causing     financial
                                 distress.
                                              iii. for issuance of appropriate writ
                                 by granting interim relief by directing the
                                 release of the petitioner's vehicle during the
                                 pendency of this writ petition.
                                              iv. for issuance of appropriate
                                 writ/writs,             direction/directions        and
                                 order/orders, which the petitioner is found
                                 entitled under the facts and circumstances of
                                 the case.
                      3.     The petitioner is owner of the truck having

          Registration No. JH-12-K-9543 which was carrying stone

          chips from Kodarma, Jharkhand and was to be delivered at

          East Champaran, Bihar. With the help of Annexure-P/2, the

          petitioner contends that the challan was issued by the proper

          authority at Jharkhand on 11.01.2026 at 08.42.54 PM and it was
Patna High Court CWJC No.1173 of 2026(2) dt.02-04-2026
                                            3/7




          valid up to 03.48.54 AM of 13.01.2026.

                      4. The vehicle was intercepted/seized on 11.01.2026

          at 10.20 PM under Nemdarganj Police Station in the district of

          Nawada by the Mining officials of Nawada and it records that

          on demand, no challan was produced. Accordingly, following

          the due process, the truck along with the stone chips were

          seized.

                      5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a

          proper authority issued a challan at 08.45.54 PM on 11.01.2026

          and was valid up till 13.01.2026 (03.48.54 AM). The admitted

          fact is that interception took place on 11.01.2026 at 10.20 PM

          and the stand is that the driver due to fear could not produce the

          challan which followed the seizure.

                      6. Aggrieved, the writ petition.

                      7. A counter affidavit has come on behalf of the

          Mining Department (respondent nos. 3 to 6) and the stand is that

          it was found to be without any challan, intercepted by the

          Police, checked by the Mining Inspector, Nawada which

          followed the seizure.

                      8. The stand is that the challan issued/produced has

          been procured from the authority after the seizure and was not

          there at the time of interception.
Patna High Court CWJC No.1173 of 2026(2) dt.02-04-2026
                                            4/7




                      9. Mr. Naresh Dikshit representing the Mining

          Department submits that the petitioner should have approached

          the District Mining Officer, Nawada initially before coming to

          this Court and if he had appeared, immediate step would have

          been taken to take the matter to its logical conclusion and in any

          case, within a period of two weeks and not later.

                      10. This Court has taken note of the facts and the

          submissions put forward by the parties. The petitioner owns a

          truck. His stand is that the challan issued by the proper authority

          records the release time as 11.01.2026 (01.42.54 PM). It was

          valid up till 13.01.2026 (03.48.54 AM). Admittedly, the

          interception took place on 1101.2026 at 10.20 PM. On the other

          hand, the stand of the respondents is that he failed to produce

          the challan which followed the seizure of the truck.

                      11. This Court has come across multiple such cases

          where the same stand is taken by the vehicle owner/Mining

          Official wherein it is contended that valid challan was produced,

          still interception/seizure took place whereas the stand of

          respondents remain that on demand, no paper/challan was

          produced.

                      12. However, the respondents for the reason best

          know have chosen not to plug the holes as a result of which the
Patna High Court CWJC No.1173 of 2026(2) dt.02-04-2026
                                            5/7




          seizures have repeatedly been declared illegal and direction

          made for the release of the vehicle by successive Courts.

                      13. In this modern era of technology, when everything

          is available at the drop of the hat, the minimum that is expected

          from the officials carrying out such exercise is to videograph the

          entire process from the interception of a vehicle till its seizure as

          is done in the western countries.

                      14. If such an exercise is undertaken, neither of the

          parties will have any grievance and/or escape route shall be

          there with regard to the interception/ demand of papers/ seizure.

          The authority shall also be free of any charges/allegation that is

          commonly made by the aggrieved parties that despite the

          production of all the valid documents including the challan, as

          the demand sought for was not fulfilled, forcible seizure took

          place. Their success rate before the Courts shall also improve if

          through video footage, they are able to prove that the seizure has

          been made in accordance with law.

                      15. To put the whole cat and mouse game to come to

          an end, this Court directs the Department of Mines and Mineral,

          Bihar to issue necessary directions to all its ground officials to

          ensure that henceforth, the entire process of interception of a

          vehicle from the time it is intercepted to demand of papers and
Patna High Court CWJC No.1173 of 2026(2) dt.02-04-2026
                                            6/7




          upon failure to produce the same and/or as vehicle found

          overloaded etc, the same shall be videographed without any cut

          and along with the seizure document, the pen drive shall also be

          handed over and this fact be recorded in the seizure order.

                      16. This exercise is necessary to bring transparency to

          the whole exercise as also to save the Department from the

          financial loss as for want of transparency, the whole exercise of

          seizure of the vehicle comes to zero in most of the cases.

                      17. This transparency is again necessary to bring the

          litigation down and come to the actual fact on the point whether

          at the time of interception, the truck/ vehicle was having proper

          document to ply on the road or not and/or whether it was

          overloaded or not.

                      18. The order has to be enforced immediately. It has

          been passed in the presence of Mr. Naresh Dikshit, learned Spl.

          P.P. Mines who undertakes to communicate the same to the

          Department forthwith for its compliance.

                      19. So far as the case is concerned, accepting the

          words of the learned Spl. P.P. Mines, the writ petition is

          disposed of allowing the petitioner to approach the District

          Mining Officer, Nawada within three days and if such petition is

          filed within the aforesaid time, the District Mining Officer,
           Patna High Court CWJC No.1173 of 2026(2) dt.02-04-2026
                                                       7/7




                     Nawada shall be duty-bound to pass an order within a period of

                     fortnight thereafter. The short period has been given to the

                     parties on their own undertakings and taking into acount the fact

                     that the truck which has been seized is deteriorating under the

                     sky.

                                 20. With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition is

                     disposed of.



                                                   (Rajiv Roy, J)
Vijay Singh/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.