Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Rohit Kumar SinghversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous upon the petitioner's withdrawal.

Summary

Petitioner Rohit Kumar Singh filed a civil writ petition against the State of Bihar and several officials of Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University. During the hearing, the petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the petitioner wished to withdraw the petition as it had become infructuous. The court granted permission for withdrawal. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as infructuous. No substantive merits of the petition were examined.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition may be withdrawn and dismissed as infructuous upon the petitioner's request

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • infructuous
  • civil writ jurisdiction
  • high court

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                 Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11730 of 2022
                   ======================================================
                   Rohit Kumar Singh Son of Kamleshwari Prasad Singh, resident of Village -
                   Dhanchhoa, Ward No. 10, P.S. - Saur Bazar, District - Saharsa.
                                                                               ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                     Versus
             1.     The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Education Department,
                    Government of Bihar, Patna.
             2.    Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur through its Registrar.
             3.    The Vice Chancellor, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur.
             4.    The Registrar, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur.
             5.    The Finance Officer, Tilka Manjhi Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur.
             6.    The Principal, Mahila College, Khagaria.
                                                             ... ... Respondent/s
                   ======================================================
                   Appearance :
                   For the Petitioner/s   :       Md. Arif Imam, Advocate
                   For the Respondent/s   :       Mr. Madhaw Pd. Yadaw, G.P.23
                   ======================================================
                   CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RITESH KUMAR
                                         ORAL ORDER

17    15-04-2026                 Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

                                 2. Md. Arif Imam, Advocate appears and submits that

                     he has been instructed by Mr. Saket Tiwary, the learned counsel

                     for the petitioner, to withdraw the writ petition, since the same

                     has become infructuous.

                                 3. Permission, so sought for, is accorded.

                                 4. The instant writ petition is dismissed as

                     infructuous.


                                               (Ritesh Kumar, J.)

Sanjay/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.