Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ram Ishwar PrasadversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

A petitioner may withdraw a pending writ petition, and the court may dismiss the petition as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Ram Ishwar Prasad, filed a civil writ petition before the Patna High Court challenging a matter involving the State of Bihar and other respondents. While the petition was pending, the petitioner’s grievance was resolved to his satisfaction. Consequently, the petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the writ petition. The court considered whether a petitioner may withdraw a pending writ petition and whether the court can dismiss it on that basis. After hearing both sides, the court granted the petitioner's request to withdraw. The writ petition was therefore dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether a petitioner may withdraw a pending civil writ petition and the court may dismiss it as withdrawn

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • civil procedure
  • high court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12572 of 2024
                  ======================================================
                  Ram Ishwar Prasad Son of Govind Ram, Resident of village and P.O.- Parthu,
                  P.S.- Ekangarsarai, Distt.- Nalanda

                                                                              ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                   Versus
             1.   The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Co-Operative
                  Department, New Secretariat, Patna.
             2.   The Registrar Cooperative Society, Bihar, Patna.
             3.   The Managing Director, Biscoman Bhawan, Biscoman Bhawan, Raja Ji
                  Salai, Chajju Bagh, Patna, Bihar- 800001

                                                            ... ... Respondent/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s   :       Mr. Shashi Bhushan Singh, Advocate
                  For the Respondent/s   :       Mr. Satya Vrat (AC to GP-10)
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
                                        ORAL ORDER

3    19-01-2026                 Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel

                    for the State are present.

                                2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                    during pendency of the writ petition, grievance of the petitioner

                    has been settled and as such, he seeks permission to withdraw

                    the present petition.

                                3. Permission, as prayed for, is granted.

                                4. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands

                    dismissed as withdrawn.



                                                             (Dr. Anshuman, J)
Divyansh/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.