Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

M/s Kaushal Agro Industries Pvt. Ltd.versusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with permission to avail the Amnesty Policy, 2025.

Summary

M/s Kaushal Agro Industries Pvt. Ltd. filed a civil writ petition before the Patna High Court challenging actions of the State of Bihar and the Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority (BIADA). The petitioner sought to withdraw the writ petition and requested permission to avail the Amnesty Policy, 2025 issued by BIADA. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted a request for withdrawal with liberty to benefit from the policy. The Court examined the request and, finding no impediment, granted permission for withdrawal. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn, allowing the petitioner to avail the Amnesty Policy.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may withdraw the writ petition and be granted liberty to avail the Amnesty Policy, 2025

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • amnesty policy
  • civil writ jurisdiction
  • BIADA

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                  Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12786 of 2024
                  ======================================================
                  M/s Kaushal Agro Industries Pvt. Ltd. through its Managing Director, Ayush
                  Agarwal, male, aged about 24 years, son of Shri Sunil Agarwal, Resident of
                  Dhanni Bhawan, CC-55, P.C. Colony, Lohianagar, Police Station-Kankarbag,
                  District-Patna.

                                                                               ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                     Versus
            1.    The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of
                  Industries, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
            2.    The Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority (BIADA) Udyog Bhawan,
                  Gandhi Maidan, Patna through its Managing Director.
            3.    The Managing Director (BIADA) Udyog Bhawan, Gandhi Maidan, Patna.
            4.    The Joint Managing Director, Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority,
                  Udyog Bhawan, Gandhi Maidan, Patna (BIADA).
            5.    The Executive Director, South, Bihar Industrial Area Development
                  Authority (BIADA), 1st Floor, Udyog Bhawan, Gandhi Maidan, Patna.
            6.    The Deputy General Manager, Bihta Cluster, Bihar Industrial Area
                  Development Authority (BIADA).
            7.    The Area In-charge Industrial Area-New Bihta, Bihar Industrial Area
                  Development Authority (BIADA), Patna.

                                                            ... ... Respondent/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr. Shashank Shekhar, Advocate.
                  For the Respondent/s   :      Mr. Government Advocate 11 with
                                                Mr. Pratik Kumar, AC to GA 11.
                  For the BIADA          :      Ms. Prakritita Sharma, Advocate.
                                                Mr. Shashank Shekhar Kunwar, Advocate.
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY
                                     ORAL ORDER

10   11-02-2026                   Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner,

                    on instructions, submits that the petitioner wants to withdraw the

                    present writ petition with a leave to avail the Amnesty Policy,

                    2025 circulated by the Respondent-BIADA vide Office Order No.

                    3348/L dated 19.08.2025.
           Patna High Court CWJC No.12786 of 2024(10) dt.11-02-2026
                                                      2/2




                                 2. Permission is granted.

                                 3. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as

                     withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.



                                                         (A. Abhishek Reddy, J)
shakir/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.