Patna High Court
Roop NarayanversusThe State Of Bihar and Ors
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
- Bench
- RITESH KUMAR
Holding
The writ application is dismissed for non‑prosecution.
Summary
Rup Narayan filed a civil writ petition before the Patna High Court challenging actions of the State of Bihar and the Bihar School Examination Board. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner despite repeated calls on two consecutive dates. Counsel for the Bihar School Examination Board and the State of Bihar were present and participated. The Court observed that the petitioner failed to prosecute the writ application. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition on the ground of non‑prosecution. The dismissal was pronounced without any substantive consideration of the merits of the petition.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition may be dismissed for non‑prosecution when the petitioner fails to appear before the Court?
Subjects
- civil writ
- non‑prosecution
- procedural default
- Patna High Court
- Bihar School Examination Board
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12981 of 2012
======================================================
Rup Narayan Son Of Late Gauri Shankar Resident Of Bagbhup Singh Lane,
Alamganj Chowki, P.S. Alamganj, Town And District Patna
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar.
2. The Bihar School Examination Board, Through Its Secretary, Patna
3. The Director, Secondary Education, Department Of Human Resources
Development, Bihar, Patna
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None
For the BSEB : Mr. Manish Kumar, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Kumar Alok, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA
ORAL ORDER
5 15-04-2024 On the last occasion i.e. on 01.04.2024, despite
repeated calls nobody appeared on behalf of the petitioner.
However, learned counsel for the BSEB as well as learned
counsel for the State were present.
2. Today, also nobody appears on behalf of the
petitioner on repeated calls.
3. Accordingly, this writ application is dismissed for
non-prosecution.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J)
ajay/-
U
Checking your session…