Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ashok RayversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The petitioner must approach the District Mining Officer for fine details and possible installment payment before the court can consider release of the vehicle.

Summary

Ashok Ray filed a writ petition seeking the release of his truck (Reg. No. HR55L2033) that was seized by the Bihar mining authorities on 10 May 2024. He claimed the respondents had not communicated the fine amount, leaving him unable to pay and causing his business to suffer. The mining department contended that the petitioner should first approach the District Mining Officer to obtain the fine details. The Court directed the petitioner to approach the District Mining Officer within four weeks, submit a copy of the order, and obtain the fine particulars, noting that the officer may consider an installment payment arrangement. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed without ordering the immediate release of the vehicle.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to immediate release of the seized vehicle without being informed of the fine amount.
  • Whether the petitioner must first approach the District Mining Officer to obtain fine details before seeking judicial relief.

Subjects

  • vehicle seizure
  • mining department
  • fine payment
  • installment payment
  • writ petition
  • district mining officer
  • procedural direction

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1305 of 2026
                 ======================================================
                 Ashok Ray Son of Late Radhika Ray, Resident of Village- Khaspur, Near
                 Vijya Bank, Police Station- Maner, District Patna.

                                                                        ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                  Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar through the Secretary Mines and Minerals Department,
                 Government of Bihar at Patna.
           2.    The Director Mines and Mineral Department, Government of Bihar at Patna.
           3.    The District Magistrate, District Patna, at Patna.
           4.    The District Mining Officer cum Mine Development Officer, District Patna
                 at Patna.
           5.    The Mining Inspector, District Patna, at Patna.
           6.    The Senior Superintendent of Police, District Patna, at Patna.
           7.    The Officer in Charge of Bihta Police Station, District Patna.

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :        Mr.Niraj Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 For the Mines          :        Mr.Naresh Dixit, Spl. P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   09-04-2026                   Heard Mr.Niraj Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the

                   petitioner and Mr. Naresh Dixit, learned Special P.P. for the

                   Mines Department.

                                 2. The present petition has been preferred for the

                   following relief/s:

                                            (i) for issue an appropriate writ directing the

                                            respondent     authorities    to      release   the

                                            petitioner's    vehicle      (Truck)       bearing

                                            registration no. HR55L2033, Chasis no.-

                                            426031AAG02206 in his favor;
Patna High Court CWJC No.1305 of 2026(2) dt.09-04-2026
                                            2/3




                                  (ii) for grant of any other relief/reliefs for

                                  which Petitioner is found entitled under the

                                  fact and circumstances of the case.

                       3. Learned counsel for the petitioner at the outset

          submits that he is he is in the dark inasmuch as the respondents

          have not come up with any fine so that appropriate steps be

          taken to pay the fine under protest and the truck ia released.

                       4. The submission is that the seizure has taken place

          on 10.05.2024, the truck is placed in an open place and getting

          deteriorated day by day. Further submission is that as he is out

          of business due to seizure of the truck, the fine amount under

          protest be allowed to be paid in the installment.

                       5. If the contention of the petitioner is correct, it is

          unfortunate that despite the seizure make on 10.05.2024, the

          respondents have not even informed him about the fine amount.

                       6. Learned Spl. P.P. Mines submits that the petitioner

          ought to have approached the District Mining Officer, Patna

          (respondent no.04) so that he could hand over the documents

          showing the fine amount.

                       7. Having heard the parties, instead of keeping the

          case pending, this Court directs the petitioner to approach the
         Patna High Court CWJC No.1305 of 2026(2) dt.09-04-2026
                                                     3/3




                   respondent no.4, the District Mining Officer, Patna in next four

                   weeks alongiwth a copy of the order who shall be duty bound to

                   provide the details relating to the fine and shall also be flexible

                   if an offer is made by the petitioner regarding payment of the

                   fine amount in installment.

                                8. The writ petition is disposed of with the aforesaid

                   observation.



                                                 (Rajiv Roy, J)
Ravi/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.