Patna High Court
Hari Kishore SinhaversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
- Bench
- ANSHUMAN
Holding
The court granted permission to withdraw the writ petition and dismissed it as withdrawn.
Summary
The petitioner, Hari Kishore Sinha, filed a civil writ petition before the Patna High Court. During the pendency of the petition, counsel submitted that the petition had become infructuous and sought the court's permission to withdraw it. The court considered the request and, finding no impediment, granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the original claim were adjudicated.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition during its pendency
Subjects
- writ petition
- withdrawal
- civil writ jurisdiction
- Patna High Court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13140 of 2022
======================================================
Hari Kishore Sinha Son of Late Ram Prasad Sinha Resident of Village-
Basbitta, P.S.- Majorganj, District- Sitamarhi, at present residing at Mohalla-
Rajivnagar Road No.5, P.S.- Rajivnagar, District- Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Principal Secretary, Road Construction Department, Government of
Bihar, Patna.
3. The Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Government
of Bihar, Patna.
4. The Chief Enquiry Commissioner, General Administration Department,
Government of Bihar, Patna.
5. The Engineer-in-Chief, Road Construction Department, Government of
Bihar, Patna.
6. The Accountant General (A and E), Bihar, Patna.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shahabuddin Azeem @ S. Azeem, Advocate
For the Respondent/s : Mr. P.K. Verma (AAG-3)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
ORAL ORDER
2 12-01-2026 Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
counsel for the State are present.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
during the pendency of the writ petition, it has become
infructuous. As such, he seeks permission to withdraw the same.
3. Permission, as prayed for, is granted.
4. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands
dismissed as withdrawn.
(Dr. Anshuman, J.)
Aman Kumar/-
U
Checking your session…