Patna High Court

Vipin KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided: 21 April 2026
Disposal: CONSIGNED
Bench: RAJIV ROY

Holding

The petition was dismissed because the petitioner did not comply with the court’s peremptory order to remove the defects within the granted time.

Summary

Vipin Kumar filed a civil writ petition before the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar and several officials. The court, on 13 January 2026, granted the petitioner four weeks to remove certain defects and issued a peremptory order. The petitioner failed to comply with this deadline, and consequently the court rejected the petition on 10 February 2026. The judge then perused the file and ordered the matter to be consigned. The petition was therefore dismissed for non‑compliance with the court’s order.

Issues considered

Whether the petitioner complied with the court’s peremptory order to remove defects within the stipulated time
Whether the petition should be dismissed for failure to comply with the order

Subjects

Court order compliance
Civil writ jurisdiction
Non‑compliance
Petition dismissal

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                   Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.134 of 2026
                  ======================================================
                  Vipin Kumar Son of Shri Ashok Prasad, Resident of Village - Narsingh Bigha,
                  Post - Teusa, P.S. -Atri, District - Gaya ji (Bihar).    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus
            1.     The State of Bihar through - Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.
            2.    Principal Secretary, Education Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
            3.    Secretary, Rural Works Department, Bihar, Patna.
            4.    Senior Superintendent of Police, District - Gaya ji.
            5.    District Magistrate, District - Gaya ji.
            6.    Additional District Magistrate, District - Gaya ji.
            7.    Sub-Divisional Public Grievance Redressal Officer, Neemchak Bathani,
                  District - Gaya ji.
            8.    Sub-Divisional Officer, Neemchak Bathani, District - Gaya ji.
            9.    Circle Officer, Atri Circle, District - Gaya ji.
            10. Officer-in-Charge, Atri Police Station, District - Gaya ji.
            11. Land Acquisition Officer, District - Gaya ji.
            12. Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department, Work Division -Neemchak
                 Bathani, District - Gaya ji.
                                                                  ... ... Respondent/s
                ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s    :       Mr.Vipin Kumar ( In Person )
                  For the Respondent/s    :       Mr.Prashant Pratap, G.P.02
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                        ORAL ORDER

3    21-04-2026                  Heard the parties.

                                2. On 13.01.2026, four weeks time was granted to

                    remove the defect(s) and the order was peremptory.

                                3. As the same was not complied, it stood rejected on

                    10.02.2026.

                                4. Perused the file, consigned.

                                                                (Rajiv Roy, J)
Ravi/-
U

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…