Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Nitu KumariversusPurnea University

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Nitu Kumari, filed a civil writ petition before the Patna High Court challenging actions of Purnea University. After the petition was filed, the petitioner’s counsel sought the Court’s permission to withdraw the petition. The Court entertained the application for withdrawal. No substantive hearing on the merits was conducted. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn. The order reflects the procedural disposition of the case without addressing any substantive issues.

Issues considered

  • Whether a civil writ petition can be withdrawn after filing and what procedure is required for such withdrawal

Subjects

  • civil writ jurisdiction
  • withdrawal of petition
  • procedural law
  • Patna High Court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                 Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13642 of 2023
                  ======================================================
                  Nitu Kumari Wife of Alok Raj, Koshi Colony, Near F.C.I. Godown, Purnea,
                  P.O. Purnea, P.S. Purnea, District-Purnea.

                                                                            ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus
             1.   Purnea University Purnea through its Registrar.
             2.   The Vice Chancellor, Purnea University, Purnea.
             3.   The Registrar, Purnea University, Purnea.
             4.   The Examination Controller, Purnea University, Purnea.

                                                            ... ... Respondent/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr. Vijay Kumar Singh, Adv.
                  For the Respondent/s   :      Mr. Rakesh Kumar Samrendra, Adv.
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
                                        ORAL ORDER

5    05-02-2026                 At the outset, Mr. Abhinav Shandilya, learned

                    Advocate for the petitioner on instruction seeks permission to

                    withdraw the present writ petition.

                                2. Learned Advocate for the respondents are present.

                                3. In view thereof, the present writ petition stands

                    dismissed as withdrawn.



                                             (Harish Kumar, J)
supratim/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.