Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

M/S RAUNAK ENTERPRISESversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The petition was disposed of, with liberty granted to approach the tax tribunal under Section 112 of the Bihar GST Act, 2017.

Summary

Raunak Enterprises filed a writ petition challenging the cancellation of its GST registration by the Joint Commissioner, who claimed the declared place of business was non‑existent, and the rejection of its appeal by the Additional Commissioner on grounds of delay. The petitioner sought quashing of both orders, restoration of its registration, and a restraining direction against coercive recovery actions. The court granted the petitioner liberty to approach the appropriate tribunal under Section 112 of the Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, to contest the order of the Additional Commissioner. No substantive merits of the writ were decided, and the petition was disposed of without granting the reliefs sought. The order emphasizes that the appropriate forum for such tax matters is the designated tribunal.

Issues considered

  • Whether the order cancelling the GST registration can be quashed by a writ of certiorari
  • Whether the rejection of the appeal on the ground of delay can be challenged in this court
  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to a direction restraining the tax authority from taking coercive recovery actions pending the writ

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • GST registration
  • cancellation
  • writ petition
  • tax authority
  • Section 112
  • coercive recovery

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13816 of 2025
                 ======================================================
                 M/S RAUNAK ENTERPRISES through its Proprietor Nagendra Sah, having
                 its Place of Business at Banraria, Singia Hibin, Motihari, East Champaran and
                 its Power of Attorney Holder Rahul Kumar, Aged about 24 Years, Gender
                 Male, Son of Pahlad Prasad Gupta, Resident of Ward No. 20, Raxaul, Near
                 Block Naya Basti, P.S. Raxaul, District-East Champaran.

                                                                        ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                 Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar through the Commissioner, State Tax, Government of
                 Bihar, Patna.
           2.    The Additional Commissioner (Appeals-1), Muzaffapur, Bihar.
           3.    joint Commissioner, State Tax, Motihari, District-East Champaran.

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr.Alok Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Respondent/s   :      Government Pleader (7)
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH
                         and
                         HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

                 (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH)

2   01-07-2026            The present writ petition has been filed seeking the

                   following reliefs:-

                               “1.ⅰ) For issuance of appropriate writ or order for
                               quashing of order dated 12.09.2023 issued vide
                               Reference No. ZA100923023809L dated 12.09.2023 by
                               the Joint Commissioner, State Tax, Motihari, East
                               Champaran whereby the GST Registration has been
                               cancelled stating that during field visit the declared
                               place of business was found non-existent;
                               (ii) For issuance of appropriate writ or order for
                               quashing of order dated 21.05.2025 issued vide
                               Reference No. ZD100525016834P dated 21.05.2025 by
         Patna High Court CWJC No.13816 of 2025(2) dt.01-07-2026
                                                    2/2




                               the Respondent No. 2, the Additional Commissioner
                               (Appeals-1), for Muzaffarpur whereby the application
                               revocation has been rejected on the ground of delay in
                               submission of appeal;
                               (iii) For a direction to the Respondent No. 3 to restore
                               the registration granted under GST Act, 2017 of the
                               petitioner whereby the registration of the petitioner was
                               cancelled without considering the reply filed by the
                               petitioner;
                               (iv) For further issuance of a direction restraining the
                               Respondent No. 3 from taking any coercive action for
                               recovery of the amount in demand during pendency of
                               the present writ petition.”
                   2.      At the outset, the Ld. Counsel for the petitioner seeks

                   liberty on behalf of the petitioner to challenge the order dated

                   21.05.2025 passed by the Ld. Additional Commissioner of State

                   Tax (Appeals), Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur, by approaching

                   the learned Tribunal under Section 112 of the Bihar Goods and

                   Services Tax Act, 2017. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

                   3.      The writ petition stands disposed of.



                                          (Mohit Kumar Shah, J)


                                                 (Raj Kumar, J)
S.Sb/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.