Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

M/s Sudha BakeryversusThe Union of India

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The tender was discharged, making the writ petition infructuous; therefore, the petition was dismissed.

Summary

M/s Sudha Bakery filed a writ petition challenging a communication dated 08‑04‑2025 that its techno‑commercial bid for Tender No. C‑470‑GMU‑91‑RXL‑2025 was declared technically unsuitable without any prior notice or reasons. The petitioner also alleged that the bid was arbitrarily allotted to R.R. Enterprise despite offering a lower rate and sought the quashing of the allotment letter. The respondents produced a Tender Decision dated 25‑07‑2025 stating that the tender had to be discharged because the location of the GMU‑91 was to be shifted under the Amrit Bharat Station Scheme and that a fresh tender would be issued. The Court observed that the tender had already been discharged, rendering the petitioner’s reliefs moot. Consequently, the writ application was held to be infructuous and was disposed of. The petition was not entertained further.

Issues considered

  • Whether the communication rejecting the bid without prior notice can be quashed.
  • Whether the alleged allotment of the bid to R.R. Enterprise was an arbitrary exercise of power.
  • Whether the writ petition remains maintainable after the tender has been discharged by the authorities.

Subjects

  • tender
  • techno‑commercial bid
  • e‑tender
  • notice
  • arbitrary exercise of power
  • writ jurisdiction
  • tender discharge
  • railway procurement
  • Amrit Bharat Station Scheme

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13818 of 2025
                 ======================================================
                 M/s Sudha Bakery Barbatta Bazaar, Sonpur, District- Saran, Pin Code-
                 841101, through its Proprietor, Arunoday Kumar, Aged about- 57 Years,
                 Male, Son of Ganga Vishnu Anavi, Resident of Barbatta Bazaar, Police
                 Station- Sonpur, Post Office- Sonpur, District- Saran, Pin Code- 841101.

                                                                               ... ... Petitioner
                                                   Versus
           1.    The Union of India through Secretary, Ministry of Railway, Government of
                 India, Rail Bhawan, 1, Raisina Road, New Delhi, Pin Code- 110001.
           2.    The Secretary, Ministry of Railway, Government of India, Rail Bhawan, 1,
                 Raisina Road, New Delhi, Pin Code- 110001.
           3.    The Divisional Railway Manager, Samastipur Division.
           4.    The Chief Vigilance Officer, East Central Railway, Hajipur, Bihar.
           5.    R.R. Enterprise, through its proprietor, Sri Manoj Kumar, Gender- Male,
                 Son of Ram Ayodhaya Sah, Resident of Anwarpur East Baghdulhan Hajipur,
                 Police Station- Hajipur Nagar, Post Office- Hajipur, District- Vaishali.

                                                           ... ... Respondents
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner    :         Mr. Sanjeev Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Respondents   :         Mr. Alok Kumar, CGC
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH
                                            and
                         HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

                         (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH)

6   30-04-2026                 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

                               2. Following is the relief sought for in the present writ

                   application:-

                                           "I. That the present writ application is being
                                           filed for quashing of the communication dated-
                                           08.04.2025, received by the proprietor of the
                                           petitioner     on     his      email       address-
                                           [email protected] by which, it
                                           has been informed to the petitioner that his
Patna High Court CWJC No.13818 of 2025(6) dt.30-04-2026
                                           2/4




                                  Techno Commercial Bid against Tender No. C-
                                  470-GMU-91-RXL-2025, which was due on
                                  24.01.2025, at 15:00 Hrs. has been found
                                  technically unsuitable due to the reason that the
                                  bid has been found unresponsive as per the
                                  tender document. The aforesaid communication
                                  has been made on the email of the petitioner i.e..
                                  [email protected] by E-tender,
                                  Samastipur Division- Commercial /East Central
                                  Railway without giving any notice to the
                                  petitioner or disclosing any reason as to why the
                                  bid has been found non-responsive as tender
                                  document.
                                  II. For allotment of techno commercial bid
                                  against tender number C-470-GMU-91-RXL-
                                  2025, which has been made in favour of
                                  Respondent No. 5 illegally and in arbitrary
                                  exercise of power by the respondent Railway
                                  authorities notwithstanding the fact that the
                                  petitioner has quoted lower rate for doing
                                  aforesaid work, than the respondent number 5.
                                  The petitioner also prays that respondent
                                  authority of railway may be directed to produce
                                  the letter of allotment of bid in favour of
                                  respondent number 5 and same may be quashed
                                  by an order of this Hon'ble Court.
                                  III. That the petitioner further prays for
                                  direction upon the respondents which this
                                  Hon'ble Court may deems fit and proper in the
                                  facts and circumstances of the present case in
                                  accordance with law."
Patna High Court CWJC No.13818 of 2025(6) dt.30-04-2026
                                           3/4




                      3. A counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the

          Respondnets-State, wherein a Tender Decision dated 25.07.2025

          has been brought on record. The relevant part of the said

          decision reads as follows:-

                                  "5.0.     DISCUSSION       ON     OFFERS     Bid
                                  Security/Security Deposit and performance
                                  gurantee and may also lead to any of the action
                                  provides in the contract including banning of .
                                  5.2 In continuation with TC minutes dated
                                  07.04.2025 further deliberation are as under:-
                                              • Convenor States that GMU-91,
                                  which is located at Raxual Railway station at
                                  PF-01 (Near Pole no. 08), may need to be
                                  shifted or relocated due to redevelopment work
                                  under Amrit Bharat Station Scheme.
                                              • It was further noted that the new
                                  location of GMU-91 cannot be determined at
                                  this stage (letter attached).
                                  6.0 सं सतु तत RECOMMENDATIONS
                                  6.1 In light of above discussion, the tender may
                                  be discharged and a fresh tender will be
                                  initiated after decision of new location."



                      4. Upon perusal of the aforesaid, it is apparent that the

          tender in question itself has been discharged, rendering the

          present writ application infructuous.

                      5. Accordingly, the present writ application stands

          disposed of as having become infructuous.
            Patna High Court CWJC No.13818 of 2025(6) dt.30-04-2026
                                                       4/4




                                  6. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand

                      disposed of.


                                                              (Sudhir Singh, J.)


                                                             (Shailendra Singh, J.)

Gaurav Kumar/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.