Patna High Court

Alok RanjanversusThe State of Bihar

Decided: 21 January 2026
Disposal: DISMISSED
Bench: ANSHUMAN

Holding

All 178 vacancies under Advertisement No. 1 of 2009 have been exhausted, leaving the petitioners without a right to participate, and the writ petition is dismissed.

Summary

The petitioners, a group of 47 candidates, sought to quash a BSSC memo that excluded Aurangabad district from a Class‑IV post examination and to be allowed to sit for the exam, invoking Advertisement No. 1 of 2009. The State and BSSC argued that the vacancies under that advertisement had been fully filled (178 posts) and that the examination scheduled for 15‑09‑2024 was already completed, rendering the petition infructuous. The petitioners contended that vacancies still existed (102 as per RTI) and that the court could direct a fresh selection process. The court examined the vacancy records, the 2018 selection committee decision, and precedent (Kapil Kumar v. State of Bihar) and concluded that all vacancies under the 2009 advertisement were exhausted by 18‑12‑2019. Consequently, the petitioners had no legal right to participate, and the writ petition was dismissed.

Issues considered

Whether the exclusion of Aurangabad district from the 2024 BSSC examination violates the petitioners' rights under Advertisement No. 1 of 2009.
Whether any vacancies for Class‑IV posts in Aurangabad district remain unfilled despite the State's claim of exhaustion.
Whether the writ petition is infructuous because the examination has already been conducted.
Whether the court can direct the BSSC to conduct a fresh examination or appointment for the petitioners.
Whether the vacancy count of 178 under Advertisement No. 1 of 2009 has been fully exhausted.

Subjects

recruitment
class‑IV posts
Bihar Staff Selection Commission
writ petition
vacancy
advertisement 2009
procedural fairness
Article 14
Article 16

Judgment

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13874 of 2024
======================================================
1. Alok Ranjan S/o- Awadhesh Singh, R/o- Mohalla Satendra Nagar, Jai Maa
Colony, Naga Bigha Road, P.O. and P.S. and Dist.- Aurangabad.
2. Rahul Kumar Singh, S/o- Gopal Singh, R/o Vill.- Akauni, P.O.- Reghaniya,
P.S.- Rafiganj, District- Aurangabad.
3. Deepak Kumar, S/o- Shiv Chandra Prasad Sinha, R/o- Mohalla- Patel
Colony, Nagabigha Road, P.O. and P.S. and Dist.- Aurangabad.
4. Jitendra Kumar Yadav, S/o- Ram Swarup Yadav, R/o Vill.- Pathak Bigha
Aroura, P.O.- Aroura, P.S.- Deo, District- Aurangabad.
5. Manish Kumar, S/o- Jagdish Prasad, R/o Vill.- Patnawan, P.O.- Padrawan,
P.S.- Jamhor, District- Aurangabad.
6. Dhananjay Kumar Singh, S/o- Madan Yadav, R/o Vill.- Tiwari Bigha, P.O.
and P.S. and Dist.- Aurangabad.
7. Mamta Kumari, D/o- Vinay Kumar Singh, R/o Mohalla- Anugrah Nagar,
Behind Sone Colony, P.O. and P.S. and Dist.- Aurangabad.
8. Rupesh Kumar, S/o- Sarju Ram, R/o- Vill.- Gangati, Ward No.- 31, P.O., P.S.
and Dist.- Aurangabad.
9. Rekha Kumari, D/o- Ramraj Ram, R/o- Vill.- Katharua, P.O., P.S. and Dist.-
Aurangabad.
10. Hari Narayan Singh, S/o- Late Bipat Singh, R/o Vill.- Jasoiya Tola, Kanhai
Bigha, P.O., P.S. and Dist.- Aurangabad.
11. Jitendra Yadav, S/o- Narayan Yadav, R/o- Vill.- Gajadhar Bigha, P.O.-
Karma Bhagwan, P.S.- Muffsil Aurangabad, District- Aurangabad.
12. Sunil Kumar, S/o- Banshi Chaudhary, R/O Mohalla- Biratpur, Gagati Road,
P.O., P.S. and Dist.- Aurangabad.
13. Ramji Thakur, S/o- Surendra Thakur, R/o Vill.- Dewriya, P.O.- Padrawan,
P.S.- Jamhor, District- Aurangabad.
14. Binay Kumar Malakar, S/o- Ganesh Bhagat, R/o Vill.- Kanchanpur, P.S.-
Kashipur, District- Aurangabad.
15. Birendra Kumar, S/o- Shalik Yadav, R/o Vill- Pipardih, P.O., P.S. and Dist.-
Aurangabad.
16. Ravindra Kumar, S/o- Shalik Yadav, R/o Vill.- Pipardih, P.O., P.S. and Dist.-
Aurangabad.
17. Hemanti Kumari, D/o- Duautal Kumar, R/o Vill.- Ram Rajya Nagar, P.O.-
Aurangabad, P.S.- Aurangabad, District-Aurangabad.
18. Sarita Kumari, D/o- Umesh Saw, R/o Vill.- Ram Rajya Nagar, P.O.-
Aurangabad, P.S.- Aurangabad, District- Aurangabad.
19. Mahendra Kumar Das, S/o- Rajvanshi Das, R/o Vill.- Mahavir Nagar. P.O.-
Aurangabad, P.S.- Aurangabad, District- Aurangabad.
Patna High Court CWJC No.13874 of 2024 dt.21-01-2026
2/17

20. Mritunjay Kumar, S/o- Jagnath Sahay, R/o Vill.- Hardtta, P.O.- Amba, P.S.-
Amba, District- Aurangabad.
21. Pradip Kumar, S/o- Satendra Singh, R/o Vill.- Khakhra, P.O.- Kunda, P.S.-
Muffasil, District- Aurangabad.
22. Manraj Kumar, S/o- Rampati Yadav, R/o Vill.- Badri Bigha, P.O.- Karma,
P.S.- Muffasil, District- Aurangabad.
23. Rajkishore Kumar, S/o- Doman Saw, R/o Mohalla- Biratpur, Dharnidhar
Road, P.O., P.S. and Dist.- Aurangabad.
24. Uday Kumar, S/o- Ramkeshi Yadav, R/o Vill- Pipardih, P.O., P.S. and Dist.-
Aurangabad.
25. Santosh Choudhary, S/o- Ram Prasad, R/o Vill.- Ora, P.O.- Kanbehari, P.S.
and Dist.- Aurangabad.
26. Arvind Kumar Thakur, S/o- Om Prakash Thakur, R/o Vill.- Bharwar, P.O.-
Belsara, P.S.- Muffasil Aurangabad, District- Aurangabad.
27. Santosh Kumar, S/o- Ram Chandra Yadav, R/o Vill.- Bisambhar Bigha Kusi,
P.O.- Aurangabad, P.S.- Aurangabad, District- Aurangabad.
28. Naresh Kumar Ravi, S/o- Mahavir Prasad, R/o Vill.- Shahpur Ambedkar
Nagar, P.O.- Aurangabad, P.S.- Aurangabad, District- Aurangabad.
29. Sunila Kumari Sen, D/o- Jagjiwan Ram, R/o Vill.- Shahpur Ambedkar
Nagar, P.O.- Aurangabad, P.S.- Aurangabad, District- Aurangabad.
30. Mahesh Kumar Ravi, S/o- Mahavir Ram, R/o Vill.- Shahpur Ambedkar
Nagar, P.O.- Aurangabad, P.S.- Aurangabad, District- Aurangabad.
31. Ajay Kumar, S/o- Madhav Singh, R/o Vill- Tetariya, P.O.- Chauriya, P.S.-
Muffasil Aurangabad, District- Aurangabad.
32. Madhubala Kumari, Indrajit Sharma, R/o Vill.- Naur, P.O.- Naur, P.S.-
Nabinagar, District- Aurangabad.
33. Ram Prawesh Ram, S/o- Dukh Bhajan Ram, R/o Vill- Bus Padaw Gandhi
Maidan Harijan Colony, P.O.- Aurangabad, P.S.- Aurangabad, District-
Aurangabad.
34. Arjun Kumar Mehta, S/o- Suryadev Mehta, R/o Vill.- Ora, P.O.- Kanbehari,
P.S.- Muffasil Aurangabad, District- Aurangabad.
35. Randhir Kumar, S/o- Phaudar Yadav, R/o Vill.- Ora, P.O.- Kanbehari, P.S.-
Muffshil Aurangabad, District- Aurangabad.
36. Arvind Kumar, S/o- Yadunandan Yadav, R/o Vill.- Gangati, P.O.-
Aurangabad, P.S. Aurangabad, District- Aurangabad.
37. Anil Kumar Singh, S/o- Birendra Singh, R/o Vill- Ajaniya, P O.- Khadiha,
P.S.- Simra, District- Aurangabad.
38. Ravi Kant Singh, S/o- Suresh Singh, R/o Vill.- Sudi Bigha, P.O.- Deo, P.S.-
Deo, District- Aurangabad.
39. Shivpujan Kumar, S/o- Ramgati Ram, R/o Vill- Mahuawan, P.O.-
Mahuawan, P.S.- Mahuawan, District- Aurangabad.
40. Sunil Kumar Singh, S/o- Birendra Singh, R/o Vill- Ajaniya, P.O.- Khadiha,
P.S.- Simra, District- Aurangabad.
Patna High Court CWJC No.13874 of 2024 dt.21-01-2026
3/17

41. Sanjay Kumar, S/o- Sikandar Ram, R/o Vill.- Dani Bigha, P.O.- Aurangabad,
P.S.- Aurangabad, District- Aurangabad.
42. Manoj Kumar Thakur, S/o- Rajendra Thakur, R/o Vill- Gangati, P.O.-
Aurangabad, P.S.- Town Aurangabad, District- Aurangabad.
43. Ramesh Kumar, S/o- Nandu Thakur, R/o Vill- Gangati, P.O.- Aurangabad,
P.S.- Aurangabad, District- Aurangabad.
44. Kishun Yadav, S/o Saguni Yadav, R/o Vill.- Pandaypur, P.O.- Aurangabad,
P.S.- Muffshil Aurangabad, District- Aurangabad.
45. Jitendra Kumar Singh, S/o- Ranvir Pratap Singh, R/o Vill.- Gupteshwar
Lodge, G.T. Road, P.O.- Aurangabad, P.S.- Aurangabad, District-
Aurangabad.
46. Sanjay Kumar Yadav, S/o- Byas Yadav, R/o Vill.- Bhora Bigha, P.O.-
Khadiha, P.S.- Aurangabad, District- Aurangabad.
47. Suneel Kumar, S/o- Kesho Ram, R/o Vill.- Virat Mohalla, P.S.- Aurangabad
Town, District- Aurangabad.

... ... Petitioner/s
Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, General
Administration Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Additional Secretary, General Administration Department, Government
of Bihar, Patna.
3. The District Magistrate, Aurangabad.
4. The Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Veterinary College, Patna through its
Secretary.
5. The Chairman, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Veterinary College,
Patna.
6. The Secretary, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Patna, Veterinary College,
Patna.
7. The Joint Secretary, Bihar Staff Selection Commission, Patna, Veterinary
College, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s

======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajeev Kumar Singh, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Dhurendra Kumar (AC to GP-5)
For the BSSC : Mr. Satyam Shivam Sundaram, Advocate
Mr. Ankit, Advocate
Mr. Aman Kumar, Advocate
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN

ORAL JUDGMENT
Patna High Court CWJC No.13874 of 2024 dt.21-01-2026
4/17

Date : 21-01-2026

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned

counsel for the State and learned counsel for the Bihar Staff

Selection Commission.

Re:- I.A No. 1 of 2025

Learned counsel for the petitioners seek permission

to withdraw this interlocutory application.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents have no

objection for the same.

3. As such, the present I.A. No. 1 of 2025 stands

dismissed as withdrawn.

Re:- C.W.J.C No. 13874 of 2024

The present writ petition has been filed for issuance

of an appropriate writ(s)/order(s)/direction(s) to the respondent

authorities for the following relief/s:-

“I. To quash the Memo No.- 2874
dated 30.08.2024, issued by the Joint
Secretary, Bihar Staff Selection
Commission, Patna, so far it relates
to the examination which has been
scheduled on 15.09.2024, whereby
and whereunder, for filling up class-
IV posts in the different departments
of different districts of the State, as
one time measure, has been
Patna High Court CWJC No.13874 of 2024 dt.21-01-2026
5/17

scheduled excluding the district of
Aurangabad that too without
assigning any reason to the
applicants of Aurangabad district.
II. To direct the respondents,
especially respondent District
Magistrate, Aurangabad to send the
list of existing vacancies of Class-IV
post of all the departments in the
district including the Collectorate,
Aurangabad to the General
Administration Department,
Government of Bihar, Patna so that
the Bihar Staff Selection Commission
takes the examination of all those
applicants who have filled-up their
application forms along with
applicants of other district of Bihar
on 15.09.2024.
III. To restrain the Bihar Staff
Selection Commission, Bihar, Patna
from conducting the examination of
applicants of other districts of the
State which is scheduled to be held on
15.09.2024 till pendency of this writ
application.
IV. And for any other relief(s) as per
the facts and circumstances of this
case.”
Patna High Court CWJC No.13874 of 2024 dt.21-01-2026
6/17

2. Learned counsel for the Bihar Staff Selection

Commission raised a preliminary objection and submits that the

entire writ petition has become infructuous due to the reason

that examination which was scheduled to take place on

15.09.2024 has become completely infructuous and as such, no

relief could be granted to the petitioners.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submit that

since, writ petition is pending therefore, it is well within the

power of this Hon’ble Court to decide this issue and it is

necessary and just in the interest of justice. Counsel submits that

the writ petitioners who are total 47 in numbers was interested

to be appointed against sanctioned and vacant Class-IV post in

the district of Aurangabad in different departments. And they all

have participated through an Advertisement no. 1 of 2009 dated

11.11.2011 which was issued under the signature of District

Magistrate, Aurangabad inviting applications from the eligible

candidates so that a panel for making appointment on Class-IV

post be prepared. Counsel further submits that the petitioners

along with others filled up the form and after filing of the

applications, scrutiny of their applications took place by the

district authority, Aurangabad and after verification of the same,

panel was prepared for appointment on Class-IV post in the
Patna High Court CWJC No.13874 of 2024 dt.21-01-2026
7/17

various departments of district of Aurangabad including the

Collectorate of Aurangabad in the year 2013 in which the name

of total 9411 applicants were there. He further submits that after

preparation of the said panel, the District Administration,

Aurangabad has appointed about 500 persons from the above

said panel in different departments of the district of Aurangabad.

However, petitioners for one or other reason could not be

appointed. Counsel submits that several writ petitions were filed

for their grievances before this Hon’ble Court. And this Hon’ble

Court vide order dated 26.07.2019 passed in C.W.J.C. No.

10967 of 2018 with analogous cases disposed off the same

directing the Collector, Aurangabad to initiate a process of

selection for appointment of Class-IV employees in terms of

Bihar Group D (Recruitment and Service Conditions) Rules,

2009, which was enforced w.e.f. 26.03.2010. Counsel submits

that due to non-compliance of the said order dated 26.07.2019,

M.J.C No. 72 of 2021 was filed.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners further

submits that during pendency of the said contempt petition, an

advertisement has come which is Annexure-P/4 dated

01.04.2023 at the level of Bihar Staff Selection Commission,

Patna. Counsel submits that in the light of the said
Patna High Court CWJC No.13874 of 2024 dt.21-01-2026
8/17

advertisement, the petitioners have to filled up the form district

wise and after scrutiny district wise, the same has to be

recommended before the commission. Counsel for the

petitioners put emphasis of this Court on the part of the

advertisement which is Annexure-P/4 and submits that it has

been stated in the said advertisement that “ आयोग दारा

परीकोपरांत सं बधधत धजला से izkIr धरधकतयो मे ftykokj अनु शसा

izs"k.k की काररवाई की जाये गी।”. Counsel further submits that in

the light of the said advertisement, the petitioners who have

filled up the form district wise for whom permission to appear

in the examination was necessary to be taken place. But, they

were not permitted to participate in the examination as the admit

cards have not been issued to them. Counsel submits that when

the date of the examination was published, then the present writ

petition has been filed with the specific relief that the petitioners

be permitted to participate in the examination. He submits that a

letter which has been issued at the level of Joint Secretary,

B.S.S.C., Patna which is impugned here i.e. Memo No. 2874

dated 30.08.2024 (Annexure-P/1), indicates that in the said

notice, the name of Aurangabad district has not been figured and

this creates cause of action for the petitioners to immediately

move before this Hon’ble Court. Counsel further submits that
Patna High Court CWJC No.13874 of 2024 dt.21-01-2026
9/17

vide order dated 19.06.2023 passed in M.J.C. No. 72 of 2021

with analogous cases (Annexure-P/7), it was the specific

pleading of the State that “all those persons who were

empanelled in the District of Aurangabad, their cases have

already been referred to the Bihar Staff Selection Commission

for the needful and as such, the contention of the petitioner that

they are ineligible to apply is unfounded”. And in view of the

above submission put forward by the learned State counsel, the

said M.J.C petition was disposed of. Counsel submits that the

order has been passed in M.J.C petition on 19.06.2023, whereas,

Annexure-P/1 has been published on 30.08.2024. He submits

that the petitioners have genuine cause and therefore, with

regard to vacancy position an RTI was demanded and vide

Annexure-P/11 it has come that till 13.03.2024, total 102

vacancies are there in Class-IV post in the district of

Aurangabad. In this contention, counsel for the petitioner

submits that in-spite of vacancy available as per the RTI and the

pleadings made by the learned State counsel in the M.J.C

petition, petitioners are entitled to participate in the

examination. He further submits that though, examination has

already been conducted, even then, it is well within the power of

the Court to direct the respondent authorities to conduct the
Patna High Court CWJC No.13874 of 2024 dt.21-01-2026
10/17

examination for the existing vacancies, as prior to examination,

the writ petition was already pending before this Hon’ble Court.

5. Learned counsel for the State on the other hand

opposes the petitioners’ case and submits that the petitioners

have basically no case at all, due to the reason that admittedly,

all petitioners were the candidates who participated in the

previous published Advertisement No. 1 of 2009 for

appointment in Class-IV post under Aurangabad district. He

submits that it was already decided unanimously in the meeting

of District Level Class-IV Selection Committee held on

31.03.2018, that all the vacancies available till date will be filled

up by appointing 178 suitable candidates selected from the

previously published panel and the tenure of the said panel will

not be extended further. He further submits that the process of

appointment has already been completed and the vacancy in

view of the Advertisement no. 1 of 2009 has already been

exhausted. And therefore, those persons who are demanding

their claim by virtue of Advertisement no. 1 of 2009, there is no

vacancy for them and hence, the relief to the petitioners is at all

not maintainable and the present writ petition is fit to be

dismissed. In support thereof, learned counsel for the State has

annexed Annexure-R/2 in the counter affidavit, wherein it is
Patna High Court CWJC No.13874 of 2024 dt.21-01-2026
11/17

indicated that the vacancy position was 178 and they shall be

appointed by virtue of the same. And in this regard, the

petitioners could not be permitted to participate as, there is no

vacancy exists for them.

6. Learned counsel appearing for the Bihar Staff

Selection Commission submits that whatever be argued by the

State, in addition to that, it is also relevant to submit that the

Bihar Staff Selection Commission conducts examination and

recommends the name of successful candidates to the concerned

department of Government of Bihar. In pursuant to

advertisement dated 31.03.2023 and in the process of selecting

the candidates, the commission vide Memo No. 1080/Aa dated

19.03.2024 sought information district wise from the District

Magistrate in required format for selecting the candidates which

was replied vide Letter No. 323/Estt. dated 09.04.2024 by the

concerned District Magistrate, Aurangabad, wherein it will

appear that there is no vacancy for the concerned post in the

concerned district for Advertisement No. 1 of 2009 (Annexure-

R 7-9/A series). Counsel further submits that the writ petition

has been filed with regard to vacancy of Class-IV post under the

Aurangabad district and as per the information received under

RTI and letter No. 585/Estt. dated 15.09.2023, earlier
Patna High Court CWJC No.13874 of 2024 dt.21-01-2026
12/17

explanation has been sought for from the office of the answering

respondents from the concerned District Magistrate and vide

Letter No. 662/Estt. dated 11.09.2024 (Annexure- R 7-9/B

series), the concerned authority replied that the vacancies for the

said post are of current period (i.e. after 31.03.2018), whereas,

with respect to Advertisement no. 1 of 2009, appointment has

been made and there is 0 (zero) vacancy against the said

Advertisement no. 1 of 2009.

7. Learned counsel for the Bihar Staff Selection

Commission further submits that it is an admitted position that

the application was filled up by the petitioners before the

District Magistrate within the district and recommendation has

not been made by the District Magistrate, Aurangabad before

the Commission, on the ground that there is no vacancy exists

against the said Advertisement no. 1 of 2009. Therefore, there is

no question of taking examination of all such type of petitioners

we are related and demanding their claim by virtue of their

name empanelled towards the Advertisement no. 1 of 2009. In

this background, he submits that there is no case of the

petitioners at all. In addition to that, counsel submits that with

regard to the said vacancy of 2023, entire process has been

completed, examination takes place, result has come and the
Patna High Court CWJC No.13874 of 2024 dt.21-01-2026
13/17

appointment has been made. And the relief as prayed by the

petitioners has already become infructuous, at the cost of their

repetitions which they have raised on the ground of

maintainability.

8. In response thereof, learned counsel for the

petitioners raised contention of two materials. The first material

is Annexure- R/2 on which the State relied i.e. the meeting

which has been held in the year 2018 and subsequently, the

stand taken by the State before the M.J.C court. He submits that

it is due to the stand of the State taken, the entire problem has

created. In the entire vacancy, it is nowhere mentioned about

Advertisement no. 1 of 2009. Therefore, he submits that still

today, the petitioners have rights to participate and that’s why a

direction be given to the Bihar Staff Selection Commission to

conduct a fresh examination for the present petitioners.

9. Upon hearing the parties and going through the

entire pleadings as well as the materials on record, it transpires

to this Court that the basis of the right accruing to the petitioners

is Advertisement no. 1 of 2009, and the genesis of the right for

the petitioners which is Advertisement no. 1 of 2009, once

exhausted and vacancy ended then, in no case, the Bihar Staff

Selection Commission in the light of advertisement of 2023
Patna High Court CWJC No.13874 of 2024 dt.21-01-2026
14/17

which has been published following the judgment passed in case

of Kapil Kumar & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors. with

other analogous cases reported in (2020) 1 PLJR 287. It

transpires to this Court that para 29 of the said judgment is very

much relevant which is quoted as under:-

“29. These writ applications are
accordingly disposed of with specific
direction to the respondents,
particularly, the Additional Chief
Secretary/ Principal Secretary,
General Administration Department,
Government of Bihar, Commissioner,
Madadh Division, Gaya and the
District Magistrate, Gaya to ensure
that the process of selection through
the advertisement in question is
completed by adopting a fair
procedure. In my opinion, holding of
written examination of the candidates
who have applied against the said
advertisement would be a fair
procedure for preparation of merit-
list, in the absence of any provision in
the Rules. This, in my opinion, would
ensure transparency in the process of
selection. Since the advertisement
was issued more than six years ago,
the respondents are directed to
Patna High Court CWJC No.13874 of 2024 dt.21-01-2026
15/17

conclude the process of selection and
appointment against such posts,
which were available on the date of
issuance of advertisement, within a
period of three months from today.
The respondents are further directed
to ensure that a fair process of
selection, strictly in accordance with
statutory rules and in conformity with
the mandate of Articles 14 and 16 of
the Constitution is undertaken on
regular basis, after advertising
number of post, so that the persons
acquiring eligibility after the
initiation of one selection process
have a chance to seek and participate
in subsequent selection processes.
This practice of fairness in the
process of selection for filling up
public posts generates faith in the
hearts and minds of the citizen in the
governance, laws and the
Constitution.”

10. In the light of the reasonings that the entire

right accrues to the petitioners by virtue of Advertisement No. 1

of 2009, and that all 178 vacancies corresponding to the said

advertisement have already been exhausted, as reflected in
Patna High Court CWJC No.13874 of 2024 dt.21-01-2026
16/17

Annexure- R 7-9/A series, the scanned copy of part of the said

advertisement is being extracted in this judgment hereunder:-

11. The above extracted part of the advertisement

indicates that upto 18.12.2019, vacancy position had become 0
Patna High Court CWJC No.13874 of 2024 dt.21-01-2026
17/17

(zero) and therefore, only due to this reason, the present writ

petition is hereby dismissed.

(Dr. Anshuman, J)
Divyansh/-
AFR/NAFR
CAV DATE NA
Uploading Date 28/01/2026
Transmission Date NA

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…