Patna High Court
Sanjeev KumarversusThe Union of India
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
Holding
The Court allowed the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition and dismissed it as withdrawn.
Summary
Sanjeev Kumar filed a writ petition in the Patna High Court challenging orders passed by respondents 4 to 6, which include Cholamandalam Investment and Finance Company Ltd. and a recovery agent. During the hearing, the petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition and approach the appropriate forum for relief. The learned counsel for the petitioner requested liberty to withdraw, and the court granted the request. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the original challenge were decided.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the writ petition and approach another forum for relief
Subjects
- writ petition
- withdrawal
- jurisdiction
- civil writ
- high court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14025 of 2023
======================================================
Sanjeev Kumar S/o-Prabhunandan Prasad R/o-Village-Sagar Churaman,
Bhagwatiya, P.S.-Kotwa, District-East Champaran at Motihari.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
1. The Union of India through The Secretary Department of Finance and
Commerce, New Delhi.
2. That Reserve Bank of India through General Manager South gandhi Maidan,
Patna.
3. The State of Bihar through The Chief Secretary Government of Bihar, Patna.
4. M/s Cholamandalam Investment of Finance Company Ltd., VNo.-45, Justice
Basheer Ahmad Sayeed Building, 2nd Floor, 2nd Line Beach, Moore Street,
Parrys, Chennai.
5. Recovery Agent M/S Arjun Repo Agency, East Champaran at Motihari.
6. Chola Mandalam Investment and Finance Company Ltd., Branch Baiyarpur,
Motihari.
7. Yadav Parking Yard, Reg. No.-PYA-MUZ-810, P.S.-Sahebganj, District-
Muzaffarpur.
8. The State of Bihar through Finance Dept. Bihar, Patna.
... ... Respondents
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rakesh Ranjan, Advocate
For the Respondents : Mr. Additional Solicitor General
For the State : Mr. Arvind Kr. Singh, AC to GP26
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY
ORAL ORDER
4 07-07-2026 1. Heard the Learned Counsel for the
petitioner as well as the Learned Counsel for the
respondents.
2. During the course of arguments, the
Learned Counsel for the petitioner sought
permission to withdraw the present Writ petition
with liberty to approach the appropriate forum for
Patna High Court CWJC No.14025 of 2023(4) dt.07-07-2026
2/2
challenging the orders passed by respondent Nos.
4 to 6.
3. Liberty is granted.
4. With the aforesaid liberty, the Writ
petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J)
Shanu/-
U
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.