Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Babita KumariversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISS FOR NON-PROSECUTION

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed due to non‑prosecution by the petitioner.

Summary

The petitioner, Babita Kumari, filed a civil writ petition before the Patna High Court. No counsel appeared on her behalf despite repeated notices and adjournments. The court observed that the petitioner was not interested in pursuing the case further. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition on the ground of non‑prosecution. The order was pronounced by Justice Dr. Anshuman.

Issues considered

  • The petitioner's failure to appear and prosecute the writ petition

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • non‑prosecution
  • dismissal
  • civil jurisdiction
  • Patna High Court

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1495 of 2022
                 ======================================================
                 Babita Kumari
                                                                            ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus
                 The State of Bihar
                                                                         ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s    :      None
                 For the Respondent/s    :      Mr. Md. Raisul Haque (Sc 10)
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   12-01-2026                    No one appears on behalf of the petitioner. Learned

                   counsel for the State is present.

                                 2. It transpires vide Order No. 3 dated 17.12.2025 that

                   no one appeared on behalf of the petitioner even after repeated

                   calls, and as a matter of last indulgence, the matter was

                   adjourned. Today also, no one has appeared on behalf of the

                   petitioner.

                                 3. It transpires to this Court that the petitioner is not

                   interested in pursuing this matter any more.

                                 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands

                   dismissed due to non prosecution.



                                                                (Dr. Anshuman, J.)

Aman Kumar/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.