Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sima DeviversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

The Court found no merit in the petition and affirmed the Collector’s order directing fresh selection, dismissing the writ petition.

Summary

The petitioner, Sima Devi, challenged an order dated 24-06-2022 issued by the Collector of Gopalganj directing a fresh selection of the Anganwadi Sevika at Centre No. 56/144, alleging that she had already been duly selected and that the order violated principles of natural justice. The petitioner’s selection had been confirmed after an Aam Sabha held on 12-02-2018 and 16-02-2018, but a rival candidate, Shabnam Khatoon, filed Anganwadi Appeal No. 49 of 2018 which was dismissed by the D.P.O., and later appealed again (Appeal No. 19 of 2018) before the Collector, who ordered a fresh selection on the ground that the rival was not given notice of the Aam Sabha. The High Court observed that the writ petition suffered from mis‑joinder and non‑joinder of necessary parties and that no evidence showed notice was given to the rival. Consequently, the Court found no ground to interfere with the Collector’s order and dismissed the writ petition, affirming the fresh‑selection direction. The interlocutory application to intervene by Shabnam Khatoon was also dismissed for lack of prosecution.

Issues considered

  • The validity of the Collector’s order directing a fresh selection of the Anganwadi Sevika.
  • Whether the petitioner’s right to natural justice was violated by the fresh‑selection order.
  • Whether the writ petition suffers from mis‑joinder and non‑joinder of necessary parties.

Subjects

  • Anganwadi
  • natural justice
  • mis‑joinder
  • writ petition
  • administrative law
  • selection process

Judgment

          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                     Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15006 of 2022
     ======================================================
     Sima Devi Wife of Shri Sanjay Gupta, Resident of Village - Amarpura, Tola -
     Shitalpur, P.S.- Mahammadpur, District - Gopalganj.

                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                        Versus

1.   The State of Bihar through the Collector, Gopalganj.
2.   The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Gopalganj.
3.   The Block Development Officer, Sidhwaliya, Gopalganj.
4.   The District Programme Officer, Gopalganj.
5.   The Child Development Project Officer, Sidhwaliya, Gopalganj.
6.   The Lady Supervisor, Aanganbadi Centre No. 144, Ward No. 14, Garm
     Panchayat Raj, Amarpura, Block - Sidhwaliya, District - Gopalganj.

                                               ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s    :      Mr. Ranjan Kumar Srivastava, Advocate
     For the State           :      Mr. S.K. Mandal (SC-3)
                                    Mr. Arjun Prasad (AC to SC-3)
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN

                             ORAL JUDGMENT

      Date : 13-01-2026

                        Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

      learned counsel for the State.

                        2. The present writ petition has been filed for the

      following relief/s:-

                                     “A. For issuance of appropriate
                                     writ/writs, order/orders for setting
                                     aside the part of the order dated
                                     24.06.2022,        passed        by       the
                                     Respondent No. 1 i.e. the Collector,
                                     Gopalganj, passed in Aanganbadi
Patna High Court CWJC No.15006 of 2022 dt.13-01-2026
                                           2/6




                                          Appeal Case No. 19/2018 whereby
                                          and whereunder he directed the
                                          Respondent No. 4 i.e. the District
                                          Programme Officer, Gopalganj to re-
                                          select the Aanganbadi Sevika at
                                          Centre No. 56/144, Ward No. 14.
                                          Gram Panchayat Raj, Amarpura,
                                          Shitalpur,    Block    -    Sidhwaliya,
                                          District -Gopalganj, ignoring the
                                          fact that the petitioner was duly
                                          selected     and    working     as    an
                                          Aanganbadi Sevika in the said centre
                                          after duly fulfilling all the eligibility
                                          criteria and the said order was
                                          passed without considering the reply
                                          filed by the petitioner, which violates
                                          the principles of Natural Justice.
                                          B. Further for staying the operation
                                          of the part of the impugned order
                                          dated 24.06.2022 regarding the re-
                                          selection of the Aanganbadi Sevika at
                                          Centre No. 56/144, Ward No. 14,
                                          Gram Panchayat Raj, Amarpura,
                                          Shitalpur, Block- Sidhwaliya, District
                                          - Gopalganj till the disposal of this
                                          writ application.
                                          C. Pass such other Order/Orders as
                                          your Lordships may deem fit and
                                          proper.”
Patna High Court CWJC No.15006 of 2022 dt.13-01-2026
                                           3/6




                         3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

         Aam Sabha was held on 12.02.2018 & 16.02.2018 by which the

         petitioner was selected on the post of Anganwadi Sevika for

         Anganwadi Centre No. 144, Ward No. 14, Gram Panchayat Raj,

         Amarpura, Shitalpur, Block- Sidhwaliya, District- Gopalganj.

         Counsel further submits that the selection letter has been issued

         to the petitioner on 16.02.2018. He submits that one Shabnam

         Khatoon a non selected candidate has challenged the selection

         of the petitioner before the D.P.O, Gopalganj by virtue of

         Anganwadi Appeal Case No. 49 of 2018, which was decided on

         03.07.2018. In the said Anganwadi Appeal Case No. 49 of 2018,

         the petitioner was respondent no.1. Against the decision of the

         said Anganwadi Appeal Case No. 49 of 2018 passed by the

         D.P.O, Gopalganj, further appeal has been filed before the

         District Magistrate, Gopalganj bearing Anganwadi Appeal Case

         No. 19 of 2018, in which the final order has come on

         24.06.2022 by which the direction for fresh selection for the

         Anganwadi post has been made by the Collector. The present

         writ petitioner being aggrieved & dissatisfied by the said order

         dated 24.06.2022 passed by the District Magistrate, Gopalganj

         in Anganwadi Appeal Case No. 19 of 2018 has preferred the

         present writ petition.
Patna High Court CWJC No.15006 of 2022 dt.13-01-2026
                                           4/6




                         4. Learned counsel for the State on the other hand

         submits that the present writ petition is fit to be dismissed, as

         against the selection of petitioner, one Shabnam Khatoon has

         filed Anganwadi Appeal Case No. 49 of 2018 in which

         petitioner was heard and the D.P.O, Gopalganj dismissed the

         said anganwadi appeal. Thereafter, Shabnam Khatoon again

         preferred another Anganwadi Appeal Case No. 19 of 2018

         before the Collector, Gopalganj, in which finding has come that

         the Aam Sabha was held on 12.02.2018 and again on

         16.02.2018 in which the said appellant was absent and it is due

         to this reason, the present petitioner has been selected. But,

         upon perusal of the record, it has been found that no evidence is

         on record by which it become clear that information with regard

         to the Aam Sabha has been communicated to the appellant of

         anganwadi appeal. And it is due to this reason, the order passed

         by the D.P.O., Gopalganj was set aside by the Collector and

         directed the C.D.P.O, Sidhwaliya, Gopalganj to ensure fresh

         selection on the post of Anganwadi Sevika in the presence of all.

                         5. After perusal of the record, it transpires that in

         the Anganwadi Appeal Case No. 49 of 2018, there were six

         persons namely, Seema Kumari, Tabassum Nahid, C.D.P.O,

         Sidhwaliya, Girija Devi, Asmina Khatoon and Sarita Devi who
Patna High Court CWJC No.15006 of 2022 dt.13-01-2026
                                           5/6




         were party respondents. Similarly, in the appeal filed before the

         Collector, the State of Bihar and others were added as party

         respondents. But, in the present writ petition, the petitioner has

         not made other persons as party who were actually party in the

         anganwadi appeal. It is due to this reason, this Court found fit

         that this case suffers from mis-joinder and non-joinder of the

         necessary parties. In addition to that, it is the specific

         observation of the Collector that no document has been

         produced before the Collector in which during Aam Sabha any

         notice was issued to the Shabnam Khatoon. And it is due to this

         reason, the Collector, Gopalganj has set aside the selection and

         directed to make fresh selection noticing to all.

                         6. In this view of the matter, this Court finds that

         there is no need of any interference in the order passed by the

         Collector, Gopalganj and hence, the present writ petition is

         hereby dismissed. The order passed by the Collector, Gopalganj

         in Anganwadi Appeal Case No. 19 of 2018 dated 24.06.2022

         (Annexure-7) is hereby approved/affirmed.

                         7. It transpires that there is one interlocutory

         application bearing I.A. No. 1 of 2023 which has been filed by

         one Shabnam Khatoon to add herself as intervenor respondent

         in the present writ petition. But, there is no one to press the said
             Patna High Court CWJC No.15006 of 2022 dt.13-01-2026
                                                        6/6




                      I.A. As such, in the light of the aforesaid facts and

                      circumstances, this I.A. No. 1 of 2023 stands disposed off.




                                                                    (Dr. Anshuman, J)
Divyansh/-
AFR/NAFR
CAV DATE                      NA
Uploading Date              16/01/2026
Transmission Date             NA


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.