Patna High Court
Balaram Sao @ Baliram SawversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- A ABHISHEK REDDY
Holding
The writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage, with the Court directing the Certificate Officer to pass a Section 10 order after hearing the petitioner.
Summary
Petitioner Balaram Sao challenged a show‑cause notice issued by the District Certificate Officer under Section 7 of the Bihar and Orissa Public Demand Recovery Act, 1914. He had already filed an explanation under Section 9, and the authority had not yet passed any final order under Section 10. The High Court, without examining the merits, disposed of the writ petition at the admission stage with the consent of both parties. The Court directed the Certificate Officer to consider the petitioner’s objections, grant a hearing, and pass the required order under Section 10 within twelve weeks. Until such an order is made, the authorities were barred from taking any coercive action against the petitioner, who may resort to any legal remedy if an adverse order is issued.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner’s writ petition challenging the Section 7 notice is maintainable when an explanation under Section 9 has been filed and no Section 10 order has been passed.
Subjects
- writ petition
- public demand recovery
- show cause notice
- Section 7
- Section 9
- Section 10
- hearing
- coercive steps
- Bihar
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15045 of 2025
======================================================
Balaram Sao @ Baliram Saw Son of Rampravesh Sao, resident of village-
Piraunta Ramchandra Nagar, P.S.- Fesar, Dist. Aurangabad (Bihar).
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary, Department of Food and
Civil Supplies Bihar, Patna.
2. The District Magistrate, Aurangabad (Bihar).
3. The Managing Director, Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation,
Bihar, Patna.
4. The District Certificate Officer, Aurangabad (Bihar).
5. The District Manager, Bihar State Food and Civil Supplies Corporation,
Aurangabad (Bihar).
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Birendra Kumar Singh, Adv.
For the Respondent/s : Mr. Standing Counsel (18)
For the BSFC : Mr. Shailendra Kr. Singh, Adv.
Mr. Utkarsha Utpal, Adv.
For the State : Mr. Binod Kr. Yadav, Adv.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY
ORAL ORDER
2 13-01-2026 Without going into the merits or demerits of the
case, the present writ petition is disposed of at the stage of
‘Admission’ with the consent of the both the counsels.
2. Having regard to the fact that the petitioner is
challenging the notice issued by the Certificate Officer under
Section 7 of the Bihar and Orissa Public Demand Recovery Act,
1914 in Case No. 85/2014-15. This court is not inclined to
entertain the same as the petitioner has already filed his
explanation to the said show cause notice under Section 9 of the
Patna High Court CWJC No.15045 of 2025(2) dt.13-01-2026
2/2
Act and till date the final orders under Section 10 have not been
passed by the authority concerned. Having regard to the same,
the present writ petition is disposed of directing the Certificate
Officer (Respondent No. 4) to pass necessary orders under
Section 10 of the Act duly taking into consideration the
objections filed by the petitioner and giving him an opportunity
of hearing. The entire exercise shall be completed as
expeditiously as possibly preferably within a period of twelve
weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of this order. Till
such time the final orders are passed, the authorities are directed
not to take any coercive steps against the petitioner. In case any
adverse orders are passed against the petitioner the petitioner is
free to avail the remedies available under the law.
(A. Abhishek Reddy , J)
Gauravkr/-
U
Checking your session…