Patna High Court
Anil KumarversusThe State Of Bihar and Ors
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
- Bench
- RAJIV ROY
Holding
The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary
The petitioner, Anil Kumar, filed a civil writ petition in the Patna High Court seeking (i) a writ to quash the order dated 16‑04‑2014 passed by the Divisional Commissioner that dismissed his land‑dispute appeal, and (ii) a prohibition against respondent No. 4 from making any construction on the disputed land. The petition named the State of Bihar and several officials as respondents. The matter was heard on 19‑01‑2026 before Justice Rajiv Roy. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner moved for withdrawal of the petition. The court accepted the withdrawal and dismissed the writ petition. No merits of the substantive claims were adjudicated.
Subjects
- writ petition
- quashing order
- land dispute
- withdrawal
- civil writ jurisdiction
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15167 of 2014
======================================================
Anil Kumar son of Sriman Narayan Singh, Resident of village- Murarchak,
Police Station- Sigori, District- Patna
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar
2. The Divisional Commissioner, Patna
3. The Land Revenue Development Commissioner, Paliganj
4. Krishnandan Singh, Son of Late Mannu Lal Singh, Resident of village-
Murarchak, Police Station- Sigori, District- Patna
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Purshottam Sharma, Advocate
: Mr. Uday Narayan Singh, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Jai Shankar Barnwal, GA-5
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
ORAL ORDER
3 19-01-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The present petition has been preferred for the
grant of following relief(s):
“(i) for issuance of an appropriate
writ(s) for quashing of the order dated
16.04.2014 passed by the Divisional
Commissioner, Patna (respondent no.2) in Land
Dispute Appeal No. 231 of 2013 by which the
Respondents had arbitrarily dismissed the
appeal of the petitioner.
(ii) for issuance of an appropriate
writ(s) commanding the respondent no.4 not to
Patna High Court CWJC No.15167 of 2014(3) dt.19-01-2026
2/2
make any construction regarding the disputed
land which is at present Gali (Rasta) of all the
family member of petitioner.
(iii) for any other relief/reliefs
applicable in the facts and circumstances of the
case.”
3. Mr. Ravi Prakash, on the instruction of Mr.
Purshottam Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for
withdrawal of the petition.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as
withdrawn.
(Rajiv Roy, J)
vinayak/-
U
Checking your session…