Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Rambau KumarversusThe Union of India

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The court held that the petitioner is entitled to approach the CGST appellate tribunal under Section 112 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, and therefore the writ petition stands disposed.

Summary

The petitioner, a GST-registered trader, filed a writ petition challenging the cancellation of his GST registration and the dismissal of his appeal on the ground of limitation. He sought various writs, including certiorari and mandamus, and claimed entitlement to the GST Amnesty Scheme. The respondents, representing the Union of India and tax authorities, had cancelled the registration and dismissed the appeal without considering merits. The court examined whether the petitioner could be permitted to approach the CGST appellate tribunal under Section 112 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. It held that such liberty could be granted, allowing the petitioner to seek redress before the tribunal. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of without further orders.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may be permitted to approach the CGST appellate tribunal under Section 112 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 for the appeal dismissed on limitation grounds
  • Whether the writ petition challenging the cancellation of GST registration and dismissal of the appeal should be entertained or disposed

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • GST
  • Central Goods and Services Tax Act
  • Section 112
  • writ petition
  • certiorari
  • limitation
  • registration cancellation
  • amnesty scheme
  • natural justice

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15185 of 2025
                 ======================================================
                 Rambabu Kumar, Male, aged about 52 Years, Proprietor, M/s Shiv Parwati
                 Traders (GSTIN 10BZGPK4680N1Z5), Son of Lala Sav, Resident of Village-
                 Manohar Bigha, P.O. and P.S.- Telhara, Nalanda, Bihar- 801306.

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus

           1.    The Union of India through the Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Department
                 of Revenue, North Block, New Delhi- 110001.
           2.    The Principal Chief Commissioner, CGST and CX, Patna Zone, Patna,
                 Bihar.
           3.    The Additional Commissioner (Appeals), CGST and CX, Patna, Bihar.
           4.    The Superintendent, CGST and CX, Biharsharif Range, Nalanda, Bihar.

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :       Mr. Jitendra Kumar Rai, Advocate
                 For the Respondent/s     :       Mr. Sriram Krishna, Sr. Advocate, CGST
                                                  Ms. Ruchi Mandal, Jr. SC, CGST
                                                  Mr. Shashank Shekhar, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                   CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH
                                               and
                               HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

                     (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH)

2   01-07-2026                 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the

                   following reliefs:-

                                                “(i) For issuance of a writ in the nature of
                                  Certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order, or
                                  direction, for quashing the impugned Order-in-Appeal
                                  dated       20.06.2025   passed     by    the     Additional
                                  Commissioner (Appeals), CGST & CX, Patna in Appeal
                                  No. GST-36/Pat/2025-26/689-93, whereby the appeal of
                                  the petitioner was dismissed solely on the ground of
                                  limitation without adjudication on merits.
Patna High Court CWJC No.15185 of 2025(2) dt.01-07-2026
                                           2/3




                                      (ii) For issuance of a writ in the nature of
                         Certiorari/Mandamus, or any other appropriate writ,
                         order, or direction, for quashing the Order-in-Original
                         dated 27.02.2024 (Reference No. ZA100224137130J)
                         passed by the Superintendent, CGST & CX, Biharsharif
                         Range, Nalanda, cancelling the GST registration of the
                         petitioner (GSTIN 10BZGPK4680N1Z5).
                                      (iii) For issuance of a writ in the nature of
                         Mandamus, or any other suitable writ, order or
                         direction, commanding the respondents to forthwith
                         restore the GST registration of the petitioner and permit
                         him to carry on business operations upon compliance
                         with statutory requirements.
                                      (iv) For a declaration that the petitioner is
                         entitled to the benefit of the Amnesty Scheme notified
                         vide Notification No. 03/2023 – Central Tax dated
                         31.03.2023 (as amended), and for a consequential
                         direction to the respondents to extend the benefit thereof
                         in the interest of justice.
                                      (v) For issuance of a writ, order, or
                         direction, declaring that the dismissal of the petitioner’s
                         appeal solely on the ground of limitation, without
                         consideration on merits, is arbitrary, disproportionate,
                         violative of Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution of India,
                         and in breach of the principles of natural justice.
                                      (vi) For any other relief(s) to which the
                         petitioner may be found entitled in the facts and
                         circumstances of the case, to secure the ends of justice,
                         equity, and fair play.”


                      2. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner

          seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to challenge the

          appellate order dated 20.06.2025 passed by the Additional
          Patna High Court CWJC No.15185 of 2025(2) dt.01-07-2026
                                                     3/3




                    Commissioner, CGST & CX (Appeals), Patna by approaching

                    the learned Tribunal under Section 112 of the Central Goods and

                    Services Tax Act, 2017. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

                                3. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands

                    disposed of.


                                            (Mohit Kumar Shah, J)


                                                  (Raj Kumar, J)
GAURAV S./-
U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.