Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Mohit JhaversusThe State Of Bihar and Ors

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioner Mohit Jha filed a civil writ petition seeking direction that the authorities pay him the full market value of his land, which had been acquired for a project and for which he had received only a minimum compensation. He claimed the land was needed to build his house. During the hearing on 13-01-2026, counsel for the petitioner requested permission to withdraw the petition. The court granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may withdraw the writ petition after filing it
  • Whether the court can dismiss the petition upon withdrawal

Subjects

  • land acquisition
  • compensation
  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • civil writ jurisdiction

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15378 of 2014
                 ======================================================
                 Mohit Jha S/o Yugeshwar Jha Resident of Village Prasad, Post Office Banki,
                 Police Station Madhepur, District Madhubani.

                                                                             ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
           1.    The State Of Bihar.
           2.    The District Magistrate, Madhubani.
           3.    The Addl. Collector, Madhubani.
           4.    The District Land Acquisition Officer, Madhubani.
           5.    The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Koshi Yojna, Sakari, Madhubani.
           6.    The Circle Officer, Madhepur Anchal, Madhubani.

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr. Prafull Chandra Jha, Advocate
                                               Mr. Keshav Kumar Jha, Advocate
                                               Mr. Rahul Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Respondent/s   :      Mr. Ram Balak Mahto, AG
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   13-01-2026                   Heard the parties.

                                 2. The present petition has been preferred for the

                   following relief(s):

                                              “i)     For      directing   the     respondent

                                    authorities specially the respondent no.2 to 4 to

                                    pay the actual amount of the land which was

                                    acquired by the respondent authority whereas the

                                    petitioner is a landless person and the said

                                    acquired land was his valuable land and the same

                                    was for the construction of a house so that the
          Patna High Court CWJC No.15378 of 2014(2) dt.13-01-2026
                                                     2/2




                                    petitioner can spent his life in that home but the

                                    same has been acquired by the respondent

                                    authority and minimum rate has been fixed and

                                    minimum amount has been paid.

                                                ii) For all consequential reliefs to which

                                    the petitioner is found entitled in course of hearing

                                    of this writ application.”

                                3. Mr. Rahul Kumar on the instruction of Mr. Prafull

                    Chandra Jha, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he

                    may be permitted to withdraw the petition.

                                4. Permission accorded.

                                5. In that background, the writ petition stands

                    dismissed as withdrawn.



                                                  (Rajiv Roy, J)
Adnan/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.