Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Balwant Construction Pvt. Ltd.versusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The writ petition is held to be infructuous and is dismissed.

Summary

Balwant Construction Pvt. Ltd. filed a civil writ petition before the Patna High Court challenging actions of the State of Bihar and its officials. The petitioner, represented by Mr. Ansh Prasad, argued that the writ application had become infructuous. The respondents, represented by the Advocate General, did not contest the claim of infructuity. The Court examined the status of the petition and concluded that it no longer required adjudication. Accordingly, the Court disposed of the writ petition as infructuous, and any pending applications, if any, were also ordered to stand disposed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition has become infructuous and should be dismissed

Subjects

  • civil writ
  • infructuous petition
  • high court
  • jurisdiction
  • disposal

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15786 of 2025
                 ======================================================
                 Balwant Construction Pvt. Ltd. having its registered office at Village Sarai,
                 P.O. Mashoudha (Jandaha), P.S. Ramgarh, District Kaimur, Bihar through its
                 Director Veer Raghawan, Male, aged about 31 years, Son of Ramji Singh,
                 Resident of New Area Jora Mandir, Dehri, P.S. Dehri Nagar, District Rohtas,
                 Bihar.

                                                                            ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus

           1.    The State of Bihar through Additional Chief Secretary, Rural Works
                 Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
           2.    The Engineer In-Chief, Rural Works Department, Government of Bihar,
                 Patna.
           3.    The Chief Engineer-2, Rural Works Department, Government of Bihar,
                 Patna.
           4.    The Superintendent Engineer, Work Circle, Aurangabad, Rural Works
                 Department, Government of Bihar.
           5.    The Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department, Works Division
                 Daudnagar, District Aurangabad, Bihar.
           6.    Ajay Singh, Son of Sri Rajendra Singh, Resident Vyapar Mandal Gali, P.O.
                 Jainamore, P.S. Jaridih, District Bokaro, Jharkhand.

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr. Ansh Prasad, Advocate
                 For the Respondent/s   :      Mr. Advocate General
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH
                         and
                         HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

                 (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH)

5   29-04-2026                   Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   present writ application has become infructuous.

                               2. Accordingly, the present writ application stands
           Patna High Court CWJC No.15786 of 2025(5) dt.29-04-2026
                                                      2/2




                     disposed of as having become infructuous.

                                 3. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand

                     disposed of.



                                                 (Sudhir Singh, J)


                                               (Shailendra Singh, J)
Sachin/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.