Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

M/s Durga Jaiswal (legal name)versusThe Union of India

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The court granted the petitioner liberty to challenge the appellate order under Section 112 of the CGST Act and disposed of the writ petition.

Summary

M/s Durga Jaiswal (Atul Automobiles) filed a writ petition in the Patna High Court challenging an order‑in‑appeal dated 16‑Oct‑2025 that rejected its appeal against an earlier order of the Assistant Commissioner, CGST & CX, Darbhanga. The petition sought mandamus to quash the appellate order, direct a fresh consideration of the appeal, stay the tax, interest and penalty demand, and refund a pre‑deposit. The court, after hearing counsel, granted the petitioner liberty to challenge the appellate order under Section 112 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, and disposed of the writ petition. No substantive merits of the tax demand were decided. The order essentially limited the relief to procedural liberty and dismissed the writ petition.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to liberty to challenge the appellate order under Section 112 of the CGST Act
  • Whether a writ of mandamus can be issued to direct the appellate authority to reconsider the appeal and stay the tax demand

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • GST
  • CGST Act
  • Section 112
  • Section 107(4)
  • writ petition
  • mandamus
  • natural justice
  • tax demand
  • stay order

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                 Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1598 of 2026
                 ======================================================
                 M/s Durga Jaiswal (legal name) Atul Automobiles (Trade name) addressed at-
                 Ward no. 02, Patna Gaddi Chowk, P.O. and P.S. Jayanagar, District-
                 Madhubani, though Manager- Rahul Jaiswal, male, aged about 36 years, Son
                 of Ganesh prasad Jaiswal, resident of Mohalla- Ward No. 02, Kharga Marg,
                 P.O. and P.S. Jainagar, District- Madhubani Bihar- 847226.

                                                                    ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                 Versus
           1.    The Union of India through the Ministry of Finance, Department of
                 Revenue, Government of India, New Delhi.
           2.    The Principal Chief Commissioner, Central Goods and Service Tax and
                 Central Excise, Patna-I Commissionerate, 1st Floor, Old Aaykar Bhawan,
                 Patna.
           3.    The Commissioner, Central Goods and Service Tax and Central Excise,
                 Patna- I Commissionerate, Patna.
           4.    The Additional Commissioner (Appeals), Central Goods and Service Tax
                 and Central Excise, Office of the Commissioner (Appeals), 2nd Floor, C.R.
                 Building (Annexe), Bir Chand Patel Path, Patna- 800001.
           5.    The Assistant Commissioner, Central Goods and Service Tax and Central
                 Excise Division, Darbhanga, Balbhadrpur, N.P Mishra Road, Near Congress
                 Office, Laheriarai, Darbhanga- 846001.

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr. Rajeev Ranjan, Advocate
                                               Mr. Vikas Kumar, Advocate
                                               Ms. Nishi Priya, Advocate
                 For the Respondent/s   :      Mr.Amit Pandeya, Sr. SC, CGST & C
                                               Ms. Ruchi Mandal, Jr. SC, CGST & C
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH
                                            and
                         HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER
                 (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH)

3   08-04-2026                     The present writ petition has been filed seeking the

                   following reliefs:-

                                “(1) For issuing of writ/order/direction/declaration

                                in the nature of Mandamus or any other

                                appropriate writ/order or direction in the nature
Patna High Court CWJC No.1598 of 2026(3) dt.08-04-2026
                                            2/4




                      thereof to quash the impugned Order-in-Appeal No.

                      523/Pat/GST/Appeal/2025-26           dated      16.10.2025

                      passed by the Additional Commissioner (Appeals),

                      Central GST & Central Excise, Patna (hereinafter

                      referred to as "the Appellate Authority"), rejecting

                      the appeal filed by the petitioner against the Order-

                      in-Original (OIO) No. 02/GST/AC/DBG/2024-25

                      dated      26.04.2024       passed   by   the    Assistant

                      Commissioner, CGST & CX, Darbhanga Division

                      (hereinafter referred to as "the Adjudicating

                      Authority"), AND

                      (II) For issuing a Writ of Mandamus directing the

                      Appellate Authority to reconsider the appeal on its

                      merits by, exercising its power to condone any

                      technical delay in filing the appeal under Section

                      107(4) of the CGST Act and by examining the

                      substantive grounds of the appeal and supporting

                      documents and pass a fresh order after and by

                      considering the petitioner's written submissions

                      giving the petitioner a fair hearing.

                      (III) Alternatively, direct the Appellate Authority to

                      remit the case back to the Adjudicating Authority
Patna High Court CWJC No.1598 of 2026(3) dt.08-04-2026
                                            3/4




                      with directions to reconsider the order by,

                      following proper procedures as mandated in the

                      CGST Act and Rules and Considering the

                      explanations and documents submitted by the

                      petitioner and providing detailed written reasons

                      for     any      non-acceptance        explanations    and

                      documents submitted by the petitioner of demand

                      raised;

                      (IV) For issuing an order of stay or suspension of

                      the demand comprising of tax, interest, and penalty,

                      pending adjudication of this petition, as recovery of

                      the demand would cause irreparable injury to the

                      petitioner's business;

                      (V)     To,     quash       the    Order-in-Original   No.

                      02/GST/AC/DBG/2024-25 dated 26.04.2024 on the

                      grounds that the order is ex-parte and passed in

                      violation of natural justice and that the conclusions

                      are based on misinterpretation of statutory

                      provisions and the factual findings are erroneous

                      and the demand raised is unjustified.

                      (VI) To, direct the respondent authorities to refund

                      the amount, 10% of the duty demand, paid by the
             Patna High Court CWJC No.1598 of 2026(3) dt.08-04-2026
                                                         4/4




                                   petitioner towards the pre-deposit for filing appeal

                                   against the impugned demand, with interest at the

                                   rate prescribed under the CGST Act;”

                                   02. After some arguments, learned counsel for the

                       petitioner seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to challenge

                       the appellate order dated 16.10.2025, passed by the Additional

                       Commissioner (Appeals) of Customs, Central GST & Central

                       Excise, Patna in Appeal Case No. 523/Pat/GST/Appeal/2025-26

                       by availing the remedy provided for under Section 112 of the

                       Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. Liberty so sought is

                       granted.

                                   03. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands

                       disposed of.



                                              (Mohit Kumar Shah, J)


                                                ( Arun Kumar Jha, J)
anuradha/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.