Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

M/s Aadarsh ConstructionversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous because the work order has already been issued to the respondent and the work is underway.

Summary

M/s Aadarsh Construction filed a civil writ petition challenging the issuance of a work order to M/s Maa Tara Construction by the Rural Works Department, Bihar. The petitioner argued that the work order had already been granted to the respondent contractor and an agreement executed, with the work already underway. The court examined the submissions and found that the petition had become moot because the work order was already in effect. Consequently, the writ petition was held to be infructuous and was disposed of. Any pending applications were also ordered to be disposed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition is maintainable when the work order has already been issued to another contractor and the work is in progress

Subjects

  • civil writ jurisdiction
  • infructuous petition
  • work order
  • public procurement
  • contract award

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16159 of 2025
                 ======================================================
                 M/s Aadarsh Construction through its Managing partner Sanjeev Kumar
                 Singh, Gender Male, Aged about 49 years, Son of Late Surendera Prasad
                 Singh, Resident of Mohalla - Lakhibagh, Gaurakshini, Manpur, P. S. Muffasil,
                 District Gaya, Pin 823003 (Bihar)

                                                                              ... ... Petitioner
                                                Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Rural Works Department,
                 Visheweshraiya Bhawan, Nehru Path, Patna.
           2.    The Engineer-in-Chief, Rural Works Department, Visheweshraiya Bhawan,
                 Nehru Path, Patna.
           3.    The Technical Bid Evaluation Committee, through its Chairman, Rural
                 Works Department, Visheweshraiya Bhawan, Nehru Path, Patna.
           4.    The Chief Engineer - 2, Rural Works Department, Bihar, Patna.
           5.    The Superintending Engineer, Gaya Circle, Rural Works Department, Gaya.
           6.    The Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department, Works Division, Gaya.
           7.    M/S Maa Tara Construction, through its partner Swati Singh, W/O- Vikash
                 Singh, R/o- Village Paroriya, P.S. - Muffasil, District - Gaya, Pin - 823003.

                                                           ... ... Respondents
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner    :       Mr. Lal Babu Singh, Advocate
                 For the State         :       Mr. S.D. Sanjay, AG
                                               Mr. Rahul Kumar, AC to AG
                                               Mr. Lokesh Kumar, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH
                                            and
                         HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN KUMAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

                          (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH)

3   02-07-2026                  Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   work order has already been issued in favour of Respondent No.

                   7, and pursuant thereto an agreement has also been executed

                   between the parties. It is further submitted that the work is

                   already in progress.
            Patna High Court CWJC No.16159 of 2025(3) dt.02-07-2026
                                                       2/2




                                  2. In view of the aforesaid submissions, the present

                      writ application stands disposed of as having become

                      infructuous.

                                  3. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand

                      disposed of.


                                                             (Sudhir Singh, J.)


                                                          (Ranjan Kumar Jha, J.)

Gaurav Kumar,
Atul/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.