Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Anuradha DeviversusThe Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The Court directed the petitioner to file a fresh representation within four weeks and ordered the corporation to consider it and pass necessary orders within four weeks of receipt.

Summary

Anuradha Devi filed a writ petition seeking a court direction for Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited (HPCL) to consider her representation dated 02‑09‑2025 requesting an extension of time to provide an alternative site. The petitioners alleged that HPCL had not acted on the representation and sought a timeframe for consideration. HPCL contended that the representation lacked acknowledgment of receipt and no postal receipt was produced, urging the petitioner to file a fresh representation. The Court, without delving into merits, disposed of the petition at the admission stage, granting the petitioner liberty to submit a suitable fresh representation within four weeks and directing HPCL to consider it and pass orders within four weeks of receipt. The petition was thus disposed with the stipulated directions.

Issues considered

  • What procedural steps must a petitioner follow to compel an administrative authority to consider a representation?
  • Can a court direct a corporation to act on a representation lacking proof of receipt?

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • representation
  • administrative law
  • extension of time
  • Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited
  • court direction
  • procedural compliance

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                 Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16237 of 2025
                 ======================================================
                 Anuradha Devi Wife of Himanshu Shekhar Resident of Village- Imadpur,
                 P.O.- Pastara, P.S.- Bligoan, District- Vaishali.

                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                 Versus
           1.    The Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited through the General
                 Manager, Jamshedji Tata Road, Mumbai.
           2.    The Chief Regional Managers (Retired), Hindustan Petroleum Corporation
                 Ltd. 2nd Floor, Rahunath Place, Harhar Mahadev Chowk, N.H.- 31, District-
                 Begusarai.
           3.    The Deputy General Manager (Retired), Hindustan Petroleum Corporation
                 Limited, 2nd Floor, Raghunath Place, Harhar Mahadev Chowk, N.H.- 31,
                 District- Begusarai.
           4.    The Engineer in Chief, North Road Construction Department, Bihar, Patna.
           5.    The Executive Engineer, Road Division No.- 1, North Muzaffarpur, Road
                 Construction Department.
           6.    The District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur.

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :     Mr. Prasoon Kumar, Adv.
                 For the Respondent/s   :     Mr. Additional Advocate General (4)
                 For the HPCL           :     Mr. Neeraj Kumar Gupta, Adv.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   19-01-2026                  Without going into the merits of the case, the present

                   writ petition is disposed of at the stage of ‘Admission’ with the

                   consent of both the counsels.

                               2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner submits that the petitioner has given a representation

                   to the respondent (HPCL) on 02.09.2025 seeking extension of

                   time to provide an alternative site but the authority till date has

                   not acted on the said representation. Learned counsel seeks a
Patna High Court CWJC No.16237 of 2025(2) dt.19-01-2026
                                           2/3




          direction from this Court to direct the respondent (HPCL) to

          consider the said representation by fixing a timeframe.

                      3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

          respondent (HPCL) submits that the representation given by the

          petitioner does not contain any endorsement of the corporation

          having received the same nor the petitioner has enclosed any

          postal receipt to show that the same has been addressed to the

          respondent corporation. Learned counsel submits that in case

          the petitioner gives a fresh representation, the same shall be

          considered in accordance with law.

                      4. Having regard to the above made submissions, the

          present writ petition is disposed of granting liberty to the

          petitioner to give a suitable representation to the respondent-

          corporation (Respondent No. 2 herein) within a period of four

          weeks from today. On such representation being given, the

          authority shall consider the same in accordance with law and

          pass necessary orders. The authority is directed to pass

          necessary orders as expeditiously as possible preferably within a

          period of four weeks from the date of receipt of the

          representation by the petitioner. Any order passed shall be

          communicated to the party.

                      5. With the above directions, the present writ petition
             Patna High Court CWJC No.16237 of 2025(2) dt.19-01-2026
                                                        3/3




                       stands disposed of.



                                              (A. Abhishek Reddy , J)
Gauravkr/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.