Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

SANT KUMAR SINGH and ANRversusPUSHPA DEVI and ORS

Decided
Disposal
CONSIGNED

Holding

The petition was dismissed due to the petitioners' failure to comply with the peremptory order.

Summary

The petitioners, Sant Kumar Singh and another, filed a writ petition before the Patna High Court. On 19 February 2026, the Court granted them a two‑week period to file the requisite documents for issuing a fresh notice to Respondent No. 3, directing compliance by a peremptory order. The petitioners failed to file the required documents within the stipulated time. Consequently, the Court noted the non‑compliance and dismissed the petition on 26 February 2026. The order was recorded as an oral order by Justice Rajiv Roy, and the case file was thereafter consigned.

Issues considered

  • Did the petitioners comply with the peremptory order to file requisites for issuance of a fresh notice to Respondent No. 3?

Subjects

  • civil procedure
  • peremptory order
  • non‑compliance
  • dismissal
  • writ jurisdiction

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                             Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16294 of 2011
                  ======================================================
                  SANT KUMAR SINGH and ANR

                                                                        ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                   Versus
                  PUSHPA DEVI and ORS

                                                            ... ... Respondent/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s   :     Mr.Md. Waliur Rahman
                  For the Respondent/s   :     Mr.Arabind Nath Pandey
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                        ORAL ORDER

5    27-04-2026                  Heard the parties.

                                2. In this case, on 19.02.2026, two weeks time was

                    granted to the petitioner to file requisites etc. for issuance of

                    fresh notice upon respondent no. 3 and the same was a

                    peremptory order.

                                3. Since the petitioner has not complied the

                    peremptory order, the same stood dismissed on 26.02.2026.

                                4. Perused the file, consigned.



                                              (Rajiv Roy, J)
Ravi/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.