Patna High Court
IndiaversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- VIKASH KUMAR
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed, with liberty granted to the petitioners to pursue the appeal before the Divisional Commissioner.
Summary
The Union of India and other defence officials filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 25‑01‑2024 issued by the Muzaffarpur District Magistrate that allowed local residents to use land claimed as defence property and directed the removal of a fence and barbed wire. The petitioners sought certiorari, mandamus and other reliefs to restore their possession of the land acquired by the army in 1923. The Court noted that an appeal against the impugned order is pending before the Divisional Commissioner, Tirhut Division. Since the petitioners have an alternative statutory remedy, the Court declined to interfere with the order. Accordingly, the writ petition was disposed of, granting the petitioners liberty to pursue the appeal before the Divisional Commissioner.
Issues considered
- What is the legal status of the land claimed as defence property acquired in 1923?
- Whether the District Magistrate's order allowing local residents to use the land and directing removal of the fence is ultra vires?
- Whether the petitioners are entitled to a writ of certiorari or mandamus in the present circumstances?
Subjects
- defence land
- land acquisition
- writ of certiorari
- mandamus
- army property
- jurisdiction
- appeal
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1633 of 2025
======================================================
1. The Union of India through the Defence Estate Officer, Jharkhand and Bihar
Circle, Danapur Cantonment.
2. The Defence Estate Officer, Jharkhand and Bihar Circle, Danapur
Cantonment.
3. The Station Head-cum-Colonel, 15 Jat Regiment, Indian Army, Muzaffarpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue
and Land Reforms, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Director, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Government of
Bihar, Patna.
3. The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Muzaffarpur.
4. The Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Muzaffarpur.
5. The Circle Officer, Mushahari, Muzaffarpur.
6. Dr. Lok Shakti Son of Hind Keshari Yadav, Resident of Race Course
Chakkar Maidan, Near Prabhat Tara School, Ward No. 10, P.S Kazi
Mohammadpur, District- Muzaffarpur.
7. Kamla Pati, Son of Ravindra Nath Sharma, Resident of Achuara, Barh,
District- Patna and at present resident of Gobarsahi Chowk, Railway Gumti
No. 04, P.S. Sadar Muzaffarpur, District- Muzaffarpur.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amarendra Nath Verma, Adv.
For the State : Mr. Prabhat Kumar (AC to GA 11)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 06-07-2026 Heard Mr. Amrendra Nath Verma, Advocate for
petitioners and Mr. Prabhat Kumar, Advocate, learned AC to GA
11 for the State.
2. The petitioner in the present writ application has
prayed for following relief/reliefs :-
(a). For issuance of a writs in the nature of
certiorari quashing the order dated 25.01.2024 passed in
Patna High Court CWJC No.1633 of 2025(2) dt.06-07-2026
2/3
Miscellaneous Case No. 01 of 2022 by the Collector,
Muzaffarpur whereby and where under the claim of local
residents including the private respondents 2nd set for use
of Army-land as road has wrongly been allowed thereby
virtually taking away from the petitioners their possession
on the subject-land continuing since acquisition in the year
1923 itself ?
b. For directing the state-respondents in
general and the respondent no.3 in particular to enquire
into and upset the baseless entry in the revisional survey
recorded as "Gair Majarua Sarvasadharan, Kism-Rasta"
whereas the said land stood fenced by Army right since
acquisition wayback in the year 1923 after payment of
appropriate compensation not assailed by anyone till date.
(c). For issuance of a writ of mandamus
directing the respondents first set to hold a detailed enquiry
with regard to the defence land appertaining to Thana
No.353, New Khata No. 635, New Khesra No.1346,
admeasuring 34 Decimal in Anchal: Mushahari, P.S.:
Sadar, Sub Division-East Muzaffarpur acquired for the
army in the year 1923 and for demarcating it for ensuring
closure of all disputes once and for all.
(d). For undoing the petitioners' unnecessarily
and illegally relegating to the cumbersome and long-drawn
title suit before the jurisdictional civil court without title-
dispute.
(e). For issuance of a writ of mandamus
restraining the respondents 2nd set and other local
residents from using the defence land so as to ensure safety,
security & privacy of the Army.
(f). For further kind indulgence of this Hon'ble
Court to look into the matter and to direct the concerned
respondents to produce all connected records for perusal of
the Hon'ble Court facilitating an appropriate order as to
the subject land being the defence land used by Army.
(g). For any other relief/reliefs that the Hon'ble
court may grant in the interest of the petitioners that may be
deemed appropriate and necessary in the special facts of
the case.”
3. In present writ application, the petitioner Union Of
India and others, have filed a petition against the order dated
25.01.2024, passed by the learned District Magistrate,
Muzaffarpur in Miscellaneous Case No. 01 of 2022, whereby it
was held that since the land in question belongs to Government
Patna High Court CWJC No.1633 of 2025(2) dt.06-07-2026
3/3
of Bihar and shown as road in the khatian entry, therefore, the
administrative Commandant for station commander Chakkar
Maidan, Circuit Housing Board, Muzaffarpur was requested to
remove the pillar and barbed-wire fence from the land in
question.
4. On being confronted, the learned counsel appearing
on behalf of the petitioners admitted that against the impugned
order, an appeal lies before the Divisional Commissioner, Tirhut
Division and prayed that liberty may be granted to avail such
remedy.
5. Accordingly, the present writ application is
disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail the alternative
remedy of appeal before the Divisional Commissioner, Tirhut
Division, Muzaffarpur.
(Vikash Kumar, J)
Ashwin/-
U
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.