Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Rungta Multicon Pvt. Ltd.versusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The writ petition is deemed infructuous as the bid validity period has expired.

Summary

Rungta Multicon Pvt. Ltd. filed a writ petition challenging the award of a contract under a National Invitation to Tender (NIT) issued by the Building Construction Department, Government of Bihar. The petitioner argued that the bid validity period stipulated in the NIT had already expired, rendering the award illegal. The respondents, representing the State of Bihar, contended that the procurement process was valid. The Patna High Court examined the claim and found that the expiration of the bid validity period meant the petition could no longer be entertained. Consequently, the Court held that the writ application had become infructuous and ordered its disposal. All pending applications, if any, were also directed to stand disposed.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition challenging a procurement award is maintainable when the bid validity period under the NIT has expired

Subjects

  • procurement
  • bid validity
  • National Invitation to Tender
  • writ jurisdiction
  • infructuous
  • public contract
  • administrative law

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16449 of 2025
                 ======================================================
                 Rungta Multicon Pvt. Ltd. having its Branch Office at Infront of Jain Colony,
                 Chunihari Tola, Bhagalpur through its Authorized Signatory Ravi Kumar,
                 Male, aged about 40 years, Son of Sri Kashi Prasad Jalan, Resident of Infront
                 of Jain Colony, Chunihari Tola, P.S. - Kotwali, District- Bhagalpur, Bihar.

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner
                                                  Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary, Building Construction
                 Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
           2.    The Engineer In-Chief, Building Construction Department, Government of
                 Bihar, Patna.
           3.    The Chief Engineer (South),            Building    Construction    Department,
                 Government of Bihar, Patna.
           4.    The Superintending        Engineer,   Building    Circle   Bhagalpur,   District
                 Bhagalpur, Bihar.
           5.    The Executive Engineer, Building Division Bhagalpur, District Bhagalpur,
                 Bihar.

                                                           ... ... Respondents
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner    :        Mr. Prabhat Ranjan
                 For the Respondents   :        Mr. S.D. Sanjay, AG
                                                Mr. Rahul Kumar AC to AG
                                                Mr. Lokesh Kumar, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH
                                            and
                         HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RANJAN KUMAR JHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

                         (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH)

4   02-07-2026                 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the bid

                   validity period for the NIT in question has already expired.

                               2. Considering the aforesaid submission, this court is

                   of the view that the present writ application has become

                   infructuous.

                               3. Accordingly, the writ application stands disposed of
               Patna High Court CWJC No.16449 of 2025(4) dt.02-07-2026
                                                          2/2




                         as having become infructuous.

                                     4. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stands

                         disposed of.


                                                                (Sudhir Singh, J.)


                                                             (Ranjan Kumar Jha, J.)

Atul, Gaurav
Kumar/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.